What is a good introductory book to understand Sartre's philosophy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thomasxc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Jean-Paul Sartre's "Being and Nothingness" presents a complex exploration of existentialism, emphasizing the concept of "existence before essence." Sartre argues against determinism, positing that individuals have the freedom to shape their own identities. For newcomers to Sartre's philosophy, "Existentialism is a Humanism" is recommended as a more accessible introduction. This foundational text provides a clearer overview of existentialist principles and Sartre's beliefs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of existentialism and its key tenets
  • Familiarity with determinism and its philosophical implications
  • Basic knowledge of Jean-Paul Sartre's contributions to philosophy
  • Awareness of Martin Heidegger's existentialist ideas
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Existentialism is a Humanism" by Jean-Paul Sartre for a foundational understanding
  • Explore the concept of determinism in philosophical discourse
  • Study Martin Heidegger's works to compare existentialist perspectives
  • Investigate the ethics of authenticity as discussed in existentialist philosophy
USEFUL FOR

Students of philosophy, individuals interested in existentialism, and anyone seeking to understand the complexities of Sartre's ideas will benefit from this discussion.

thomasxc
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
i bought Sartre's "being & nothingness" and have tried my best to comprehend it. to me it seems to be a mess,and i can make neither head nor tail of it. wikipedia didnt help much either. can someone steer me in the right direction or try to help me understand it? thanks in advance.



-Tom
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sartre's 'Being and 'Nothingness' is essentially a position against determinism.
 
determinism is what, in so many words? that term seems to get thrown around a lot with sartre as well.
 
thomasxc said:
determinism is what, in so many words? that term seems to get thrown around a lot with sartre as well.

You are correct in your assertion that Jean-Paul Sartre is associated with existentialism. Existentialism is, to say the least, a "base" system of beliefs that supports other types of beliefs (see ethic of Authenticity). Sartre was, in fact, as staunch supporter of existentialism. He believed that humans exist before they define themselves. This essentially means that as humans we have the ability to take initiative and shape ourselves. The key phrase associated with existentialism is "existence before essence", which sums up what I have said. Sartre wrote being and nothingness in a time of great turmoil. It was more or less of a call to the people of France to pull themselves up and truly live.

Anyways, Sartre, because of his existentialist beliefs, was opposed to the idea of determinism. Determinism, as you may have guessed by now, is more or less of the idea that we have been pre-destined, our destinies already sealed by the time we come into existence. This ties in with the precept of pre-destination used by Calvinists if I recall correctly. There is a basic guideline, perhaps I rambled.

Another fascinating existentialist was Martin Heidegger, though I must admit he is not easy to read if you are new to such texts.
 
yes, calvinists believed in predestination.and yes, i am new to such texts.but i figured i'd start somewhere, and learn a bit of all the different ones so that i might be able to sort of formulate my own opinion on all this existing business. and thanks for the quick replies.
 
thomasxc said:
yes, calvinists believed in predestination.and yes, i am new to such texts.but i figured i'd start somewhere, and learn a bit of all the different ones so that i might be able to sort of formulate my own opinion on all this existing business. and thanks for the quick replies.

thanks for confirming my thoughts on calvinism in that case
 
youre welcome. i recently finished a european history course, and that was a considerable chapter.
 
it just seems that the biggest hassle with being and nothingness is how he uses the same word in five different ways. it feels like semantics.needless to say, i read it when i want to fall asleep-it works marvelously.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
22K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
907
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K