Schrödinger's equation and line width

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the origins of spectral linewidth in quantum mechanics, specifically whether it can be explained solely by the uncertainty principle or if Schrödinger's equation and quantum electrodynamics (QED) are also necessary for a complete understanding. The scope includes theoretical considerations and the implications of different quantum frameworks on spectral line behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether spectral linewidth is solely a consequence of the uncertainty principle or if Schrödinger's equation also contributes, suggesting that discrete energy levels from Schrödinger's equation imply no linewidth.
  • Another participant argues that photon emission and absorption processes are better explained by quantum field theory, specifically referencing Dirac's work from 1927.
  • A different viewpoint asserts that while QED describes photon emission, the natural linewidth can be explained through the concept of decaying stationary states, referencing Weisskopf and Wigner's work and the mathematical form of the line shape.
  • One participant suggests that both perspectives have merit, indicating that the linewidth can be understood through the uncertainty principle or the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, depending on whether one accepts experimental values for decay times.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of QED for explaining spectral linewidth, with some advocating for the sufficiency of the uncertainty principle and others emphasizing the role of quantum field theory. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence on definitions and the context of decay times, indicating that assumptions about the nature of transitions and the role of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation are critical to the discussion.

Gavroy
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
is the spectral linewidth something that is only explained by the uncertainty principle or do you also get this from schrödinger's equation? cause i would say, that schrödinger gives us discrete energy levels if we talk about atoms and therefore there should appear no linewidth.

or do i need to take quantum electrodynamics into account to make proper predictions of spectral lines?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I vote for the latter explanation: Emission and absorption of photons is described by quantum field theory. In fact it has been invented by Dirac in 1927 to explain precisely this emission and absorption processes.
 
okay, thank you...
 
I disagree, and vote for the first one. While it's true that the emission of photons is ultimately described by QED, this is not necessary to explain the linewidth. The natural linewidth of atomic spectral lines is just one example of a general feature of a decaying stationary state, independent of the interaction that causes it, first elaborated by Weisskopf and Wigner in the context of nuclear physics. If the state has a time dependence e-iEt = e-(Γ/2)t e-iE0t where Γ is related to the lifetime of the state by τ= 1/Γ, the line shape for the emitted radiation is proportional to 1/((E - E0) + Γ2/4). This is known as a Lorentzian or Breit-Wigner form.

QED becomes necessary if you want to calculate Γ itself, or higher order radiative corrections to the line shape.
 
I'd say your both right, because what vanhees71 is saying gives the explanation of why the Gamma that Bill_K is talking about is not zero! But if one is willing to accept its value as given by experiment, then one can proceed to an understanding of linewidth directly from the HUP, or from the (time-dependent) Schroedinger equation that is the source of the HUP. It sounds like Gavroy might be asking essentially "why do transitions happen at all" given the time-independent Schroedinger equation, but we are saying that you have to use the time-dependent Schroedinger equation, either because QED says the Hamiltonian is perturbed, or because experiment tells us there is a decay time there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K