Graduate Seeking advice about solving an ODE

  • Thread starter Thread starter BillKet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ode
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation represented as a second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) with specific initial conditions. The user seeks an analytical solution, particularly interested in how the solution depends on the parameter B, given that B is much smaller than A and ω. An asymptotic expansion approach is suggested, leading to a series of equations for the coefficients that can be solved iteratively. The simplification of the ODE by omitting the term involving B² is also discussed, with a potential solution expressed in terms of integrals. The conversation emphasizes the importance of comparing analytical results with numerical solutions for validation.
BillKet
Messages
311
Reaction score
30
Hello! I am trying to solve the time dependent Schrodinger equation for a 2x2 system and I ended up with this ODE:

$$y''=-iA\sin{(\omega t)}y'-B^2y$$

with the initial conditions ##y(t=0)=0## and ##y'(t=0)=B##. I can look at it numerically but I was wondering if there is a way to get something analytical out of it. In my case I have ##B<<A,\omega## (not sure if that helps), but I am interested in the way ##y## depends on B, so I can't just drop that term either. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First set \tau = \omega t so that <br /> \frac{d^2 y}{d\tau^2} + i\alpha\sin(\tau) \frac{dy}{d\tau} + \epsilon^2 y = 0 subject to y(0) = 0, y&#039;(0) = \epsilon where \alpha = A/\omega and \epsilon = B/\omega \ll 1.

Pose an asymptotic expansion <br /> y(t) \sim \sum_{k=0}^\infty \epsilon^ky_k(t) in the limit \epsilon \to 0. Then the ODE becomes <br /> (y&#039;&#039;_0 + i\alpha\sin(\tau) y&#039;_0) + \epsilon(y&#039;&#039;_1 + i\alpha\sin(\tau) y&#039;_1) \\<br /> + \sum_{k=2}^\infty \epsilon^k \left(y&#039;&#039;_k + i\alpha\sin(\tau)y&#039;_k + y_{k-2}\right) = 0 so that considering coefficients of \epsilon^k we have <br /> \begin{split}<br /> y&#039;&#039;_0 + i\alpha \sin(\tau) y_0&#039; &amp;= 0 \\<br /> y&#039;&#039;_1 + i\alpha \sin(\tau) y_1&#039; &amp;= 0 \\<br /> y&#039;&#039;_k + i\alpha \sin(\tau) y_k&#039; &amp;= -y_{k-2} \end{split} subject to the initial conditions
\begin{gather*}y_k(0) = y&#039;_k(0) = 0, \quad k \neq 1 \\<br /> y_1(0) = 0, \quad y_1&#039;(0) = 1.\end{gather*} The equation for y_k can be solved by an integrating factor once y_0, \dots, y_{k-1} are known. ("Solved" in the sense that the solution can be written in terms of integrals, but the integrals may or may be expressible in terms of elementary functions.) It seems that y_{2k} \equiv 0 so only the odd terms contribute.
Note that this expansion is only valid so long as <br /> \left| \frac{y_{2k+3}}{y_{2k+1}} \right| &lt; \frac 1{\epsilon^2}.
 
Last edited:
If we omit ##-B^2 y## in RHS, we can solve the simplified ODE,
y=B\int_0^t du \ e^{\frac{iA}{\omega}\cos \omega u}
We may be able to expect that in a short time the solution of the original ODE does not so much different from it. I would appreciate it If you could check the difference with your numerical solution.
 
It i spossible to obtain a power series solution. The system is of the form <br /> \dot x = M(t)x for x \in \mathbb{R}^2 where x = (y, \dot y)^T and <br /> M = \begin{pmatrix} 0 &amp; 1 \\ -B^2 &amp; -iA\sin \omega t \end{pmatrix}. Then setting \begin{split}<br /> x(t) &amp;= \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nt^n \\<br /> M(t) &amp;= \sum_{n=0}^\infty M_nt^n \end{split} we have <br /> \sum_{n=0}^\infty (n+1)a_{n+1}t^n = \sum_{n=0}^\infty t^n \left[ <br /> \sum_{m=0}^n M_{n-m}a_m<br /> \right] whence <br /> a_{n+1} = \frac{1}{n+1} \sum_{m=0}^n M_{n-m} a_m, \qquad n \geq 0<br /> with a_0 = (0, B)^T.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K