I Seeking Visualization Tools for Hypothetical Black Hole Concept

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter andrefff1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of a hypothetical 'white hole,' which would repel light rather than attract it like a black hole. Participants explore the implications of this idea on light behavior and image visualization. There is a request for software tools to visualize this concept, akin to existing programs like 'Space Engine' that depict black holes. However, it is noted that while white holes are theoretically considered, they are still thought to possess attractive gravity, challenging the original premise. The conversation highlights the need for visualization tools to better understand these complex astrophysical concepts.
andrefff1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have a idea I'd like to explore: If a black hole can bend light due to its immense gravitational attraction, could we imagine an 'inverted black hole' or a 'white hole'? In this hypothetical scenario, this 'white hole' would behave similarly to a black hole but with a force of repulsion instead of attraction. This repulsion would cause light to curve away from it, making it impossible for light to reach the white hole.
I'm also curious about whether there are software or codes available that could help me visualize this concept, similar to how software like 'Space Engine' visualizes regular black holes.
Right now, to keep things simple, I wish only to explore how this hypotetical object would affect light and images.
 
Space news on Phys.org
andrefff1 said:
In this hypothetical scenario, this 'white hole' would behave similarly to a black hole but with a force of repulsion instead of attraction.
No, there is no such thing. The theoretical constructs called "white holes" are the time reverses of black holes, but still have attractive gravity.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and PeroK
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top