Semi-Simple Lie Algebra Representations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the unique decomposition of representations of semisimple Lie algebras into irreducible representations. Participants explore the conditions under which this decomposition is established and the equivalence of restrictions of representations to subspaces.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that any representation of a semisimple Lie algebra acting on a finite-dimensional complex vector space can be uniquely decomposed into irreducible representations, questioning the uniqueness of this decomposition.
  • Another participant suggests using induction on the quotient space to show that two decompositions of the vector space must share isomorphic summands.
  • A question is raised regarding the equivalence of restrictions of representations to specific subspaces, emphasizing the definition of irreducibility as having no invariant subspaces other than zero and itself.
  • A participant responds by explaining that the identity map on the vector space restricts to the identity on one of the irreducible components, leading to an isomorphism with a corresponding component in another decomposition.
  • Further clarification is requested on the explicitness of the argument, particularly regarding the generality of the representation being considered.
  • A participant defends their previous explanation, reiterating the steps taken to establish the isomorphism between the irreducible components and emphasizing the use of the identity map in the argument.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing levels of clarity and explicitness in their arguments, but there is no consensus on the uniqueness of the decomposition or the equivalence of restrictions, as the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves assumptions about the properties of representations and the nature of isomorphisms, which may not be fully articulated or agreed upon by all participants.

lion8172
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to prove that any representation of a semisimple Lie algebra can be uniquely decomposed into irreducible representations.

I have seen some sketches of proofs that show that any representation \phi of a semisimple Lie algebra which acts on a finite-dimensional complex vector space V is completely reducible (i.e. V = V_1 \oplus V_2 \oplus \cdots \oplus V_k, such that the restriction of \phi to each V_i is irreducible). But how do we know that this decomposition is unique?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You show that in two decompositions

V\cong \oplus V_i \cong W_j

that one of the summands V_r is isomorphic to one W_s, wlog V_1 and W_1, then use induction on V/V_1.
 
question

So two representations \phi and \phi ' for \mathfrak{g} are said to be equivalent if there is an isomorphism E between the underlying vector spaces such that E \phi (X) = \phi' (X) E, \forall X \in \mathfrak{g}. How do we know that the restriction of a representation to a given V_i above is equivalent to a restriction of that representation to a given W_i?
Note that, by irreducible, I mean a vector space with no invariant subspaces under the given representation (except zero and itself).
 
Last edited:
The identity map on V restricts to the identity map on V_1. This must then factor through one of the W_i, wlog W_1, hence V_1 is isomorphic to W_1.
 
Could you be a little more explicit?
Note that I'm trying to prove this for an arbitrary representation.
 
I know what you're trying to do; I was explicit; where do you see me do something not for an arbitrary representation? You want to show that V_1 is isomorphic to W_1 (after reordering the indices of the W_i). That is what I did.

1. You want to find an isomrphism from V_1 to W_1, that is maps f,g such that gf= Id on V_1 and fg=Id on W_1. That is the definition of isomorphism.

2. Consider Id on V. This maps \oplus V_i to \oplus W_j, and back again.

3. Look at V_1 mapping under Id to \oplus W_j.

4. The image must lie in at least one of the W_j. WLOG W_1.

5. So we have a map, Id restricted to V_1, call it f, that maps to W_1.

6. Call Id restricted to W_1 g.

7. What is gf? It is Id on V_1.

I really can't be any more explicit. In fact that is precisely what I wrote before.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K