How Does Semiclassical State Counting Relate to Quantum Energy Eigenstates?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jostpuur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Counting State
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between semiclassical state counting and quantum energy eigenstates, specifically within a fixed energy interval [E_A, E_B]. It asserts that the measure of the set defined by the classical Hamiltonian H(x,p) is approximately proportional to the number of energy eigenstates in the corresponding quantized model. The conversation suggests that this measure may need to be adjusted by dividing by \hbar or a power of \hbar, depending on the dimensionality. The user also references a paper on Quantum Correction For Thermodynamic Equilibrium, indicating a potential link to the topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics and energy eigenstates
  • Knowledge of semiclassical approximations
  • Basic grasp of statistical mechanics, particularly Boltzmann distribution
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of semiclassical state counting in quantum mechanics
  • Study the role of \hbar in quantum mechanics and its implications in energy measurements
  • Examine the Quantum Correction For Thermodynamic Equilibrium paper for insights on energy eigenstates
  • Explore the Boltzmann distribution in quantum systems, especially with degenerate energy levels
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and students studying the intersection of classical and quantum systems will benefit from this discussion.

jostpuur
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
19
Long time ago I encountered a claim that if you fix some energy interval [E_A,E_B], the measure of the set

<br /> \{(x,p)\;|\;E_A\leq H(x,p)\leq E_B\}<br />

where H(x,p) is some classical Hamiltonian, is going to be approximately proportional to the number of energy eigenstates contained in the energy interval in the quantized model. It could be that you had to divide this measure by \hbar, and that's where the approximate number would come from. Or perhaps by some power of \hbar depending on the dimension?

Do you know this result, and does it have a recognizable name? How is it justified (proven)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't have ability to download that pdf file, but based on the title I would guess that that reply got accidentally sent to a wrong thread. I had recently opened another thread where I requested information about Boltzmann distribution in quantum mechanical setting:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/boltzmann-with-degenerate-levels.902321/

When a PF user has multiple tabs opened in his or her browser, I guess it can happen that a message gets accidentally sent to a wrong thread?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 113 ·
4
Replies
113
Views
13K