Undergrad Separability of a Hamiltonian with spin

  • Thread starter Thread starter Salmone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian Spin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Hamiltonian ##\hat{H}=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2r^2+\frac{A}{\hbar^2}(J^2-L^2-S^2)## is indeed separable into two distinct parts: ##H_1=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2r^2## and ##H_2=\frac{A}{\hbar^2}(J^2-L^2-S^2)##. The commutation relation ##[H_1,H_2]=0## confirms this separability, as demonstrated through the evaluation of the individual commutators. The scalar nature of ##p^2## and the spatial dependence of ##r^2## ensure that both components commute with the angular momentum and spin operators, validating the conclusion that the Hamiltonian can be expressed as the sum of ##H_1## and ##H_2##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with angular momentum operators
  • Knowledge of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of spin in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of separability in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the role of angular momentum operators in quantum systems
  • Learn about the significance of commutation relations in Hamiltonian dynamics
  • Investigate the applications of Hamiltonians with spin in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers focusing on Hamiltonian systems and angular momentum in quantum theory will benefit from this discussion.

Salmone
Messages
101
Reaction score
13
I'd like to know if this Hamiltonian ##\hat{H}=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2r^2+\frac{A}{\hbar^2}(J^2-L^2-S^2)## is separable into two parts ##H_1=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2r^2## and ##H_2=\frac{A}{\hbar^2}(J^2-L^2-S^2)## and ##[H_1,H_2]=0##. Here A is a constant. I did so:

##[H_1,H_2]=[\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2r^2,\frac{A}{\hbar^2}(J^2-L^2-S^2)]=##
##=[\frac{p^2}{2m},\frac{A}{\hbar^2}(J^2-L^2-S^2)]+[\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2r^2,\frac{A}{\hbar^2}(J^2-L^2-S^2)]=##
##=\frac{A}{2m \hbar^2}([p^2,J^2]-[p^2,L^2]-[p^2,S^2])+\frac{a}{2 \hbar^2}([r^2,J^2]-[r^2,L^2]-[r^2,S^2])=## ##=\frac{A}{2m \hbar^2}([p^2,L^2]+[p^2,S^2]+2[p^2,L_xS_x]+2[p^2,L_yS_y]+2[p^2,L_zS_z]-[p^2,L_x^2]-[p^2,L_y^2]-[p^2,L_z^2]-## ##-[p^2,S^2])+\frac{A}{2 \hbar^2}([r^2,J^2]-[r^2,L^2]-[r^2,S^2])=\frac{A}{2m \hbar^2}([p^2,2L_xS_x]+[p^2,2L_yS_y]+[p^2,2L_zS_z])+\frac{A}{2 \hbar^2}([r^2,J^2]-[r^2,L^2]-[r^2,S^2])## now, since ##p^2## is a scalar and it's a function of spatial coordinates, it commutes with the component ##L_i## of the angular moment and with Spin operators and the same can be said about ##r^2## so the first commutator is ##0## and the hamiltonian is separable in ##H_1+H_2##. Am I right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That's right!
 
  • Like
Likes Salmone and gentzen
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
947
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
885
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K