Spin-orbit interaction and two inconsistent values

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the spin-orbit interaction of an electron with orbital angular momentum characterized by ##l=0##. It establishes that for this case, the total angular momentum quantum number ##j## can take values of ##0## and ##\frac{1}{2}##, leading to total angular momentum squared values of ##J^2=3/4## and ##-1/4## (normalized to ##\hbar^2##). The calculation of the scalar product ##L.S## yields conflicting results of ##0## and ##-1##, indicating a misunderstanding of the quantum numbers involved, particularly the distinction between ##j## and ##m##. The valid quantum number for ##j## does not include negative values, clarifying that ##j = -\frac{1}{2}## is incorrect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically angular momentum.
  • Familiarity with quantum numbers, including total angular momentum quantum number ##j## and magnetic quantum number ##m##.
  • Knowledge of the spin-orbit coupling concept in quantum systems.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation used in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of spin-orbit coupling in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of angular momentum in quantum systems.
  • Explore the differences between total angular momentum quantum number ##j## and magnetic quantum number ##m##.
  • Investigate the normalization of angular momentum states in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists specializing in atomic and molecular physics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of spin-orbit interactions.

hokhani
Messages
601
Reaction score
22
TL;DR
Two inconsistent values for spin-orbit interaction in different approaches
For an electron in the orbital characterized by ##l=0## we have ##j=0\pm1/2## and so ##J^2=j(j+1)## gives ##J^2=3/4## and ##-1/4## (normalized to ##\hbar^2##). Finally, ##L.S=1/2(J^2-L^2-S^2)## results in ##L.S=0## and ##-1##. However, according to ##L.S=l_xs_x+l_ys_y+l_zs_z## we find ##L.S=0## for ##l=0##. I don't know where is my mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The quantum number ##j## is the characteristic AM of the system. We have ##j = 0, \frac 1 2, 1, \frac 3 2 \dots##

We never have ##j = - \frac 1 2##. This is not a valid quantum number for ##j##.

You are confusing this with the quantum number ##m##. For ##j = \frac 1 2##, we have ##m = \pm \frac 1 2##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and hokhani

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K