Separation of Variables and Integrating over an Interval

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Mayhem
Messages
440
Reaction score
325
TL;DR
How integrating over an interval works for separation of variables
I was solving the van't Hoff equation over an interval ##[T_1 , T_2]##:

The van't Hoff equation

##
\frac{\mathrm{d} \ln K}{\mathrm{d} T} = \frac{\Delta_r H^{\circ}}{RT^2}
##

which can be solved with separation of variables:

##
d \ln K = \frac{\Delta_rH^\circ}{RT^2}dT
##
##\Updownarrow##
##\int_{T_1}^{T_2} d \ln K = \int_{T_1}^{T_2} \frac{\Delta_rH^\circ}{RT^2}dT##
##\Updownarrow##
##\int_{T_1}^{T_2} d \ln K = \frac{\Delta_rH^\circ}{R} \int_{T_1}^{T_2}\frac{1}{T^2}dT##

Here is the confusing part. Intuitively, I want to evaluate the LHS over the integral, but I can see that this doesn't exactly work as ##\ln K## isn't a value of ##T##, but rather a function of ##T##. So we would write it as:

##
\ln K_{T_2} - \ln {K_{T_1}} = -\frac{\Delta_rH^\circ}{R}\left (\frac{1}{T_2}+\frac{1}{T_1} \right )
##

This is the result that my textbook writes, to the symbol, and I am wondering how I should interpret the LHS. Does this mean that ##K_{T_1}## and ##K_{T_2}## is some value dependent on the ##T_1## and ##T_2## respectively? I understand the RHS perfectly, I'm just a little confused as to how I should interpret the LHS. Bonus question: how do we kind of generalize this for these kinds of problems, where we separate the values and integrate over an interval?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you're actually doing is this:
\begin{align*}
\frac{\mathrm{d} \ln K}{\mathrm{d} T} &= \frac{\Delta_r H^{\circ}}{RT^2} \\
\int_{T_1}^{T_2} \frac{\mathrm{d} \ln K}{\mathrm{d} T}\,dT &= \int_{T_1}^{T_2} \frac{\Delta_r H^{\circ}}{RT^2}\,dT
\end{align*} Then you're making the substitution ##\ln K = f(T)## so that ##d(\ln K) = f'(T)\,dT##. Then the LHS becomes
$$\int_{T_1}^{T_2} \frac{\mathrm{d} \ln K}{\mathrm{d} T}\,dT = \int_{T_1}^{T_2} f'(T)\,dT =\int_{f(T_1)}^{f(T_2)} d(\ln K).$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mayhem
vela said:
What you're actually doing is this:
\begin{align*}
\frac{\mathrm{d} \ln K}{\mathrm{d} T} &= \frac{\Delta_r H^{\circ}}{RT^2} \\
\int_{T_1}^{T_2} \frac{\mathrm{d} \ln K}{\mathrm{d} T}\,dT &= \int_{T_1}^{T_2} \frac{\Delta_r H^{\circ}}{RT^2}\,dT
\end{align*} Then you're making the substitution ##\ln K = f(T)## so that ##d(\ln K) = f'(T)\,dT##. Then the LHS becomes
$$\int_{T_1}^{T_2} \frac{\mathrm{d} \ln K}{\mathrm{d} T}\,dT = \int_{T_1}^{T_2} f'(T)\,dT =\int_{f(T_1)}^{f(T_2)} d(\ln K).$$
This is chemistry, where #K# is the equilibrium constant. Conceptually I should understand this as #K_T# meaning "the equilibrium constant at a temperature T" then? Seems like a very powerful equation in that case.