Say there is a sequence of points: {[tex] x_k,y_k [/tex]} that has a convergent subsequence:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

{[tex] {x_k_i,y_k_i}} [/tex]} that converges to: [tex] (x_0,y_0) [/tex].

Sorry for poor latex, it should read "x sub k sub i"

Can I extrapolate the sequence {[tex]x_k_i[/tex]} and say it converges to [tex] x_0 [/tex] seperately?

The reason I ask this is because I would like to show that the projection of a compact set S in the x,y plane to the x-axis is also compact. Basically picking a sequence [tex] x_k [/tex] in the projection , finding a corresponding sequence {[tex] x_k,y_k [/tex]} in S where [tex] y_k [/tex] is arbitrary, that has a convergent subsequence whose limit is [tex] (x_0,y_0) [/tex], but then if I can bust that subsequence apart I can show the sequence in the projection has a convergent subsequence thus proving compactness (since sequentially compactness implies compactness for subsets of R^n)

Or do I need to project the subsequence in S down to the x-axis first? It seems like kind of "hand waving math" to just pull apart the subsequence and say each sequence of coordinates converges to a particular coordinate. Could someone point me in the right direction?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Sequences and Subsequences

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**