Set Theory Proofs: A, B, and C - Solving for Set Equality and Complements

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving set theory proofs involving arbitrary sets A, B, and C. The first proof establishes that if A ∩ B = A ∩ C and A ∪ B = A ∪ C, then B must equal C. The second proof demonstrates that if A − B = B − A, then A equals B. The third proof, which remains unresolved for some participants, requires showing that if A ∩ B = A ∩ C = B ∩ C and A ∪ B ∪ C = U, then A⊕B⊕C = U, utilizing the characteristic function approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set operations: intersection (∩), union (∪), and set difference (−).
  • Familiarity with the concept of universal sets (U) in set theory.
  • Knowledge of characteristic functions and their properties.
  • Ability to apply proof techniques such as contrapositive and contradiction.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of characteristic functions in set theory.
  • Learn about the contrapositive proof method in mathematical logic.
  • Explore advanced set theory concepts, such as symmetric differences (⊕).
  • Practice solving set theory proofs with varying complexities and conditions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of set theory and proof techniques.

MikeLandry
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have gotten to this point with a and b but do i am totally lost with c. Any help would be much appreciated

Consider any three arbitrary sets A, B and C.
(a) Show that if A ∩ B = A∩ C and A ∪ B = A ∪ C, then B = C.
(b) Show that if A − B = B − A, then A = B.
(c) Show that if A∩B = A∩C = B ∩C and A∪B ∪C = U, then A⊕B ⊕C = U.

For the three proofs so far i have

a) So A intersects C = A intersects B and A union B= A union C.

Let
png.latex
then
png.latex
. Suppose then that
png.latex
then
png.latex
and thus
png.latex
. Contradiction.

Similarly, let
png.latex
then
png.latex
. Suppose that
png.latex
then
png.latex
and so
png.latex
. Contradiction

b)
AB=ABc where Bc is the complement of B.

Now if AB then (x)[xABc or xBAc]for
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi MikeLandry,

Welcome to MHB! :)

I think you have the right idea for part one, but I would alter a couple of things. To show two sets, $B$ and $C$ are equal you need to show $B \subseteq C$ and $C \subseteq B$. Put another way $x \in B \implies x \in C$ and $x \in C \implies x \in B$. I think you already showed both of those things by the contrapositive but you didn't write what you showed implies.

Jameson
 
Thank you very much for your quick reply. I feel confident with my solutions for questions a and b but any insite on how to solve part c would be greatly appreciated
 
MikeLandry said:
I feel confident with my solutions for questions a and b but any insite on how to solve part c would be greatly appreciated

An elegant way (but not the only one), is to use the characteristic function. Being $U$ an universal set and $M\subset U$ the characteristic function $1_M:U\to \{0,1\}$ is defined by: $$1_M(x)=\left \{ \begin{matrix} 1 & \mbox{ if }& x\in M \\0 & \mbox{if}& x\not\in M\end{matrix}\right.$$ Using the properties $$\begin{aligned}&M_1=M_2\Leftrightarrow1_{M_1}=1_{M_2}\\&1_{M\cup N}=1_M+1_N-1_M\cdot 1_N\\&1_{M\oplus N}=1_M+1_N-2\cdot1_M\cdot 1_N\end{aligned}$$ and the hypothesis $A\cup B\cup C=U$ (that is, $1_{A\cup B\cup C}=1_U$) you'll easily verify that $A\oplus B\oplus C=U$ iff: $$1_A\cdot 1_B+1_A\cdot 1_C+1_B\cdot 1_C-3\cdot 1_A\cdot 1_B\cdot 1_C=0$$ Now, use the hypothesis $A\cap B=A\cap C=B\cap C$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K