Short term irradiation nuclear weapon

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of a "short term irradiation nuclear weapon," which is not currently in use and poses challenges due to the inherent nature of nuclear fission, which typically results in long-lasting radiation. The inquiry seeks theoretical or factual guidance on creating a weapon that would have effects lasting only a few minutes to days. Suggestions include exploring the neutron bomb, which is designed to produce immediate effects with reduced fallout, and the hypothetical pure fusion bomb, which would theoretically avoid fallout altogether. Additionally, the idea of "dirty" conventional bombs that spread radioactive material is mentioned, though they would typically result in longer-lasting radioactivity. The emphasis is on ensuring that any proposed concepts are grounded in real-world physics.
be082
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello all. I am not a physicist and would probably be considered a "physics idiot" by people on this site, so please excuse any ignorance on my part.

I am writing a book and need some help with the physics of nuclear weapons. For the purposes of my book, I am looking to have one of my characters create what I as a layman would call a "short term irradiation nuclear weapon" (please forgive if the verbiage is incorrect).

From my research, i have surmised that this could not be any type of in use weapon, as all appear to have fission as some part of the "equation", and this would create long term irradiation in the affected areas. If anyone out there could give me some guidance, theoretical or factual, as to how this type of weapon might be created it would be very helpful to me for the purposes of my book.

Feel free to be as "theoretical" as you like, The more fantastical the better provided the science actually would work. In short, a weapon which the "desired effects" last for only a few minutes or days, and then cease. Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
be082 said:
Hello all. I am not a physicist and would probably be considered a "physics idiot" by people on this site, so please excuse any ignorance on my part.

I am writing a book and need some help with the physics of nuclear weapons. For the purposes of my book, I am looking to have one of my characters create what I as a layman would call a "short term irradiation nuclear weapon" (please forgive if the verbiage is incorrect).

From my research, i have surmised that this could not be any type of in use weapon, as all appear to have fission as some part of the "equation", and this would create long term irradiation in the affected areas. If anyone out there could give me some guidance, theoretical or factual, as to how this type of weapon might be created it would be very helpful to me for the purposes of my book.

Feel free to be as "theoretical" as you like, The more fantastical the better provided the science actually would work. In short, a weapon which the "desired effects" last for only a few minutes or days, and then cease. Thanks in advance for any help.

Just a note to any repliers, I need the science/physics to be real. They moved it to the science fiction section which is ok, but I'm looking for real world physics of these potential types of weapons. Thanks.
 
Do you specifically want a nuclear weapon that produces short lived fallout or would a weapon with no fallout be good too? Pure fusion bombs are a hypothetical type of hydrogen bomb that would not produce any fallout:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_fusion_weapon
 
Dirty ("salted") conventional bombs that just spread radioactive material can lead to radioactivity for a few days or more. Less than a few days would lead to serious production and transportation issues.
 
We've just had an interesting thread about generation ships, but I don't think that that is the most reasonable way to colonize another planet. Fatal problems: - Crew may become chaotic and self destructive. - Crew may become so adapted to space as to be unwilling to return to a planet. - Making the planet habitable may take longer then the trip, so the ship needs to last far longer than just the journey. - Mid-flight malfunction may render the ship unable to decelerate at the destination...
I'm looking to pick the brains for a fantasy story of someone who knows a little about how ancient aquatic reptiles (~65Mya) might have migrated to breeding grounds in ancient Atlantic Ocean and its shores. The premise is that such creatures, last seen 65 million years ago, managed to survive through the ages on the shores of mid-Atlantic islands - now gone - and ended up in (relatively) modern times. The questions are mostly about how their migration patterns for breeding might have...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Back
Top