Should I submit an 840 PGRE in my applications to top US PhD programs?

  • Context: Admissions 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Murex
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on whether to submit an 840 Physics Graduate Record Examination (PGRE) score when applying to top 25 US PhD programs in computational/theoretical condensed matter physics. The original poster (OP) has a perfect 4.00 GPA, significant research experience, and strong letters of recommendation. While many top students are not submitting PGRE scores, the OP is inclined to submit their score to mitigate any concerns regarding their undergraduate program's recognition. The consensus suggests that if the undergraduate program is well-regarded, submitting the PGRE may not be necessary.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Physics Graduate Record Examination (PGRE) and its role in graduate admissions.
  • Familiarity with the significance of GPA and research experience in PhD applications.
  • Knowledge of how admissions committees evaluate candidates from various undergraduate programs.
  • Awareness of standard physics textbooks used in upper-division coursework, such as Griffiths and Taylor.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest trends in PGRE submission among top physics PhD programs.
  • Learn about the evaluation criteria used by admissions committees for graduate applications.
  • Investigate the impact of undergraduate program reputation on graduate school admissions.
  • Explore strategies for effectively communicating with potential advisors and faculty during the application process.
USEFUL FOR

Prospective PhD students in physics, particularly those applying to competitive programs, as well as academic advisors and mentors guiding students through the application process.

Murex
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I know there have been several threads over the years asking advice on whether to submit PGRE scores, but I couldn't find a very recent one that gives advice to someone in a similar situation.

I'm applying to about 15 US PhD programs, all of which are in the top 25. Only a couple do not accept the PGRE; for the rest it's optional, and for some of those (e.g. Caltech, Stanford), it's recommended. I'm applying for computational/theoretical condensed matter.

Here are my stats:
  • 4.00 GPA. I did my lower division coursework at a respected community college where the top grade is an A. I've been doing my upper division coursework at a state school ranked in the top 50 for physics, and some classes there award A+ as the top grade. I've obtained the highest possible grades in all of my courses.
  • Several scholarships, three of which are merit scholarships for physics/mathematics.
  • Research experience at one of the major national labs (one summer full-time, and then about a year of research part-time after that); REU at a school ranked in the top 20 for physics (still working on the project from that).
  • Participation in a competitive bridge program run by one of the top theoretical physics institutes.
  • I expect to have three great letters of recommendation.
  • I'm a nontraditional student - I already have a separate B.A. in philosophy from an Ivy, as well as a J.D. from a top 5 law school (doubt this will mean that much, but figured I'd mention it anyway).
Based on the threads I've read, I'm leaning toward sending it, since while not amazing, it's still a pretty good score, and at least it will ensure that no one suspects I bombed/would have bombed. At the same time, it seems that many students (even many of the top students) aren't taking the PGRE these days. If anyone has inside knowledge of how admissions committees tend to think about this these days, I'd great appreciate it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
A lot might come down to how well recognized your undergraduate program is.

Often the PGRE is used as a mitigator for grades from unfamiliar programs. While it's not a perfect surrogate, it can help the committee to rank you against students from programs they are more familiar with.

So if you're fairly sure that your program and courses will be well-recognized then there probably isn't much point in submitting your PGRE in your case*. If you're a graduate of Earl's Flat Earth College and Dog Catching Services, then submitting an above average score is probably a good idea.

Ways that you can tell the difference (for less extreme cases):
  • Compare the textbooks and syllabuses from the courses you've taken with those used at the school you're applying to.
  • Ask them directly. When you check out potential graduate programs, speak with professors in the department, potential advisors, graduate students, etc. See what they recommend.

*In this case the OP has a very high GPA. For others, submitting a PGRE could help if its an amazing score, but the GPA isn't perfect. That said, it won't completely balance out a non-competitive GPA.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Murex
Choppy said:
A lot might come down to how well recognized your undergraduate program is.

Often the PGRE is used as a mitigator for grades from unfamiliar programs. While it's not a perfect surrogate, it can help the committee to rank you against students from programs they are more familiar with.

So if you're fairly sure that your program and courses will be well-recognized then there probably isn't much point in submitting your PGRE in your case*. If you're a graduate of Earl's Flat Earth College and Dog Catching Services, then submitting an above average score is probably a good idea.

Ways that you can tell the difference (for less extreme cases):
  • Compare the textbooks and syllabuses from the courses you've taken with those used at the school you're applying to.
  • Ask them directly. When you check out potential graduate programs, speak with professors in the department, potential advisors, graduate students, etc. See what they recommend.

*In this case the OP has a very high GPA. For others, submitting a PGRE could help if its an amazing score, but the GPA isn't perfect. That said, it won't completely balance out a non-competitive GPA.
Thanks for the reply, Choppy. My upper-division courses have used pretty standard textbooks: Griffiths for QM and E&M, Taylor for classical mechanics, and Schroeder for stat mech.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
709
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K