Should I submit an outlandish physics idea that feels right?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the consideration of submitting a novel physics idea involving a new set of coordinate transformations that differ from Lorentz transformations. The participant expresses uncertainty about the validity and potential reception of their theory, which claims to provide a coherent mechanical framework compatible with special relativity and Newtonian mechanics while predicting measurable phenomena at high velocities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a new set of coordinate transformations that may offer a coherent mechanical framework, reducing to Newtonian mechanics at low velocities and compatible with special relativity.
  • Another participant questions the readiness of the original poster to defend their idea against potential criticism and the possibility of it being ignored.
  • A later reply emphasizes the importance of being prepared for criticism, without asserting that such outcomes will definitely occur.
  • The original poster expresses confidence in their idea, stating it feels either true or too complex to falsify, despite previous failures with other ideas.
  • There is a reminder that the forum is not intended for discussing new personal theories, suggesting limitations on the scope of the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the viability and potential reception of the proposed idea. There is no consensus on whether the idea should be submitted for publication, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding its merit and the participant's readiness for criticism.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights uncertainties regarding the originality and acceptance of the proposed theory, as well as the participant's concerns about the implications of submitting an unsupported idea.

Ahmed1029
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
I'm curious to get people's opinions about whether this is interesting enough to write up for submission.

I arrived at a set of coordinate transformations that are different from the Lorentz transformations, but which produce a coherent mechanical framework. It gives a very beautiful physical picture, reduces to Newtonian mechanics at low velocities and is compatible with the postulates of SR, yet predicts phenomena that should be measurable at high enough velocities and that have never been proposed before.

I have all the necessary equations, yet I'm not sure if this can be published since the theory is based on an unsupported bold guess that seems to be right, and I'm not sure if it solves any current problem in theoretical physics. Should I submit an article?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends. Are you prepared to defend it against harsh criticism? Worse, are you prepared to have it ignored and not taken seriously?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and Ahmed1029
DaveC426913 said:
Depends. Are you prepared to defend it against harsh criticism? Worse, are you prepared to have it ignored and not taken seriously?
Sure. I've been really looking to find something new about physics for a while now, but every idea I got was trivially wrong or inconsistent. This one I think is either true or too heavy for me to falsify. I'm generally however not afraid from embarrassment.
 
To clarify, I'm not saying those things will happen, simply that you should be prepared.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ahmed1029
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
Ahmed1029 said:
I'm curious to get people's opinions about whether this is interesting enough to write up for submission.

I arrived at a set of coordinate transformations that are different from the Lorentz transformations, but which produce a coherent mechanical framework. It gives a very beautiful physical picture, reduces to Newtonian mechanics at low velocities and is compatible with the postulates of SR, yet predicts phenomena that should be measurable at high enough velocities and that have never been proposed before.

I have all the necessary equations, yet I'm not sure if this can be published since the theory is based on an unsupported bold guess that seems to be right, and I'm not sure if it solves any current problem in theoretical physics. Should I submit an article?
As you know from your previous warnings, PF is not the place to try to discuss new personal theories. Thread will remain closed, and you should be sure to read through this Insights article: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wont-look-new-theory/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: topsquark, Ahmed1029 and dlgoff

Similar threads

  • · Replies 190 ·
7
Replies
190
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
851
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
25K