MHB Show all real roots are negative

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative Roots
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Show that all real roots of the polynomial $f(x)=x^5-10x+38$ are negative.

Note:

I know this is a fairly easy challenge, but it's good to see how different approaches can be generated from different people so that we can learn from one another. :o (Yes)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Show that all real roots of the polynomial $f(x)=x^5-10x+38$ are negative.

Note:

I know this is a fairly easy challenge, but it's good to see how different approaches can be generated from different people so that we can learn from one another. :o (Yes)

$f(x)= x^5 + 10(3.8-x) $
it is >0 for $0\le x\lt3.8$

further
$f(x) = x(x^4-10) + 38$

for $x\gt 2$ above is > 0 as $2^4 = 16 \gt 10$

so above is >0 for $2\le x$

we have shown that it is positive for x > 0 so no root 0 or positive hence all real roots are -ve.
 
Last edited:
kaliprasad said:
$f(x)= x^5 + 10(3.8-x) $
it is >0 for $0\le x\lt3.8$

further
$f(x) = x(x^4-10) + 38$

for $x\gt 2$ above is > 0 as $2^4 = 16 \gt 10$

so above is >0 for $2\le x$

we have shown that it is positive for x > 0 so no root 0 or positive hence all real roots are -ve.

Hi kaliprasad,

Thanks for participating.:) I am curious, is there any chance when you rewritten the function of $f$ as $f(x) = x(x^4-10) + 38$, you mean to imply the domain when $x\ge 10^{\tiny\dfrac{1}{4}}$?
 
anemone said:
Hi kaliprasad,

Thanks for participating.:) I am curious, is there any chance when you rewritten the function of $f$ as $f(x) = x(x^4-10) + 38$, you mean to imply the domain when $x\ge 10^{\tiny\dfrac{1}{4}}$?

You are right but I have shown that it is true for x < 3.8 from the 1st equation and I have chosen a suitable value < 3.8 ( that is 2) to show that it is true for x > 2. $x\ge 10^{\tiny\dfrac{1}{4}}$ condition is a superset of it. but if it is true for x > 2 it does meet the criteria
 
kaliprasad said:
You are right but I have shown that it is true for x < 3.8 from the 1st equation and I have chosen a suitable value < 3.8 ( that is 2) to show that it is true for x > 2. $x\ge 10^{\tiny\dfrac{1}{4}}$ condition is a superset of it. but if it is true for x > 2 it does meet the criteria

Oh My...I don't know what is wrong with me! How could I ask something so stupid! Sorry kali, I so wish to retract what I have asked just to appeared to be less silly...:o
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top