Show that a f: Z -> R , n -> n*1(subr) is a homomorphism of rings

  • Thread starter Thread starter General_Sax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f: Z → R defined by f(n) = n * 1R is a homomorphism of rings, where 1R represents the multiplicative identity in the ring R. To establish this, one must verify the properties of ring homomorphisms: f(a + b) = f(a) + f(b) and f(a * b) = f(a) * f(b). The function correctly maps integers to their corresponding multiples of the identity in R, confirming that it adheres to the definition of a ring homomorphism. The clarification that n * 1R is equivalent to adding 1R, n times, is crucial for understanding the mapping.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring theory and ring homomorphisms
  • Familiarity with the properties of integers and their operations
  • Knowledge of the identity element in ring structures
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of ring homomorphisms in detail
  • Explore examples of homomorphisms between different rings, such as Z and Z/nZ
  • Learn about the significance of the identity element in various algebraic structures
  • Investigate the implications of mapping functions in abstract algebra
USEFUL FOR

Students of abstract algebra, mathematicians exploring ring theory, and anyone studying the properties of homomorphisms in algebraic structures.

General_Sax
Messages
445
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that a f: Z → R , n → n*1R is a homomorphism of rings


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure how to exactly go about answering this question, but I'm going to try to start with the definition:

f(a+b) = f(a) + f(b)
f(a*b) = f(a) * f(b)
f(1Z) = 1R

Ok, so if I actually have a clue what the problem statement means -- which is just slightly possible -- then this function maps values 'n' to 'n' times the identity unit of R. Which is equal to the identity unit of Z, so I think that part of the definition is more-or-less covered.

How do I go about using the first two parts of the definition?

The function is just f(n) = n right?
so do I just sub in (a+b) for n?
f(a+b) = f(a) + f(b) ?
Is there anyway I can actually show that this is the case? I mean isn't this intuitive/properly defined upon the integers?

same for the other part
f(ab) = f(a)*f(b) ... I'm just not sure how to actually show this...

thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
no, f(n) = n is't true.

for example, if R = Z6, f(23) = 5.

realize that n*1R isn't "n", it's:

1R+1R+...+1R (n summands).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K