Show that G is a subset of the symmetric group

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Symmetric
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the set \( G \), defined as \( G=\{f: M\rightarrow M \mid \forall x,y\in M : d(x,y)=d\left (f(x), f(y)\right )\} \), is a subset of the symmetric group \( S_n \). Participants confirm that to establish \( G \subseteq S_n \), it is necessary to demonstrate that each function \( f \in G \) is both injective and surjective. Using the Pigeonhole Principle, they conclude that if \( f \) is not surjective, it leads to a contradiction, thereby confirming that \( f \) must be surjective.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of symmetric groups, specifically \( S_n \).
  • Familiarity with injective and surjective functions.
  • Knowledge of the Pigeonhole Principle.
  • Basic concepts of metric spaces, particularly the properties of the distance function \( d:M\times M\rightarrow \mathbb{R} \).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of symmetric groups and their applications in combinatorics.
  • Learn about injective and surjective mappings in detail.
  • Explore the Pigeonhole Principle and its implications in proofs.
  • Investigate metric spaces and the role of distance functions in mathematical analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying abstract algebra, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of functions within the context of symmetric groups.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $n\in \mathbb{N}$ and $M=\{1, 2, \ldots , n\}\subset \mathbb{N}$. Let $d:M\times M\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ a map with the property $$\forall x, y\in M : d(x,y)=0\iff x=y$$
Let \begin{equation*}G=\{f: M\rightarrow M \mid \forall x,y\in M : d(x,y)=d\left (f(x), f(y)\right )\}\end{equation*} and $S_n$ the symmetric group, i.e. the set of all bijective maps of $M$ to itself with the composition.

Each $f\in G$ ist injective.

I want to show that $G\subseteq S_n$. We have to show that $f\in S_n$, i.e. that $f$ is surjective, or not? Could you give me a hint how we could show that? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mathmari,

You're correct, we need to show that $f$ is both surjective and injective. Since you've only asked about surjectivity, I will assume you've handled the injectivity part already.

By way of contradiction, suppose $f$ is not surjective and that there are $k$ elements of $M$ that $f$ doesn't map onto. Can you construct an argument from here? Hints: Use the Pigeonhole Principle (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigeonhole_principle) and the defining property of the set $G$. Feel free to let me know if anything is unclear.
 
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

Let $n\in \mathbb{N}$ and $M=\{1, 2, \ldots , n\}\subset \mathbb{N}$. Let $d:M\times M\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ a map with the property $$\forall x, y\in M : d(x,y)=0\iff x=y$$
Let \begin{equation*}G=\{f: M\rightarrow M \mid \forall x,y\in M : d(x,y)=d\left (f(x), f(y)\right )\}\end{equation*} and $S_n$ the symmetric group, i.e. the set of all bijective maps of $M$ to itself with the composition.

Each $f\in G$ ist injective.

I want to show that $G\subseteq S_n$. We have to show that $f\in S_n$, i.e. that $f$ is surjective, or not? Could you give me a hint how we could show that? (Wondering)

Hey mathmari!

From the property we have that if $x\ne y$ that $d(x,y)\ne 0$ don't we?

Now suppose that we have an $f\in G$ that is not surjective...
$M$ has exactly $n$ elements. If one element is not reached, then there must be 2 elements that have the same image, mustn't it?
After all, the pigeonhole principle says: if there are more items than slots, there must be a slot with 2 items. (Thinking)

EDIT: Aww, beaten to it by GJA.
 
Didn't mean to swoop in, I like Serena. I will gladly defer this post to your expertise!
 
Last edited:
So, we have the following:

We assume that $f\in G$ is not surjective.

$M$ has exactly $n$ elements. If one element is not reached, then there must be $2$ elements that have the same image.

According to the pigeonhole principle we get that $x\neq y$ with $f(x)=f(y)$, or not?

From $x\neq y$ we get that $d(x,y)\neq 0$. From $f(x)=f(y)$ we have that $d(f(x), f(y))=0$. But since it holds that $d(x,y)=d(f(x), f(y))$, we get a contradiction.

Therefore, $f$ is a surjective map. Is everything correct? (Wondering)
 
Yep. All correct. (Nod)
 
I like Serena said:
Yep. All correct. (Nod)

Great! Thanks a lot! (Smile)
 
In general, for any finite set $X$, a mapping $f:X\to X$ is injective if and only if it is surjective.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
943
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
973
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K