MHB Show that the number a is not a square of an integer

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer Square
AI Thread Summary
The number a = 201340168052123987111222893 is shown to not be a square of an integer using modular arithmetic in Z_8. The calculation reveals that a reduces to [5] in Z_8, while the possible quadratic residues in this system do not include [5]. Additionally, it is noted that examining the last digit of a in base 10 shows it ends in 3, which is also not a possible last digit for a perfect square. Thus, both methods confirm that a cannot be a square of an integer. The discussion concludes with validation of the correctness of the approach.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o I have to show that the number $a=201340168052123987111222893$ is not a square of an integer, without doing calculations.Could I solve this in $\mathbb{Z}_8$?
I mean that the number $a$ can be written as followed:
$$a=3+9 \cdot 10 +8 \cdot 10^2 + 2 \cdot 10^3+...$$
Since at $\mathbb{Z}_8$: $[10]=[2], [10^2]=[4], [10^3]=[8]=[0], [10^k]=[0] \text{ for }k \geq 3$ we have:
$$[a]=[3]+[9] \cdot [10]+[8] \cdot [10^2]+[2] \cdot [10^3]+...=[3]+[1] \cdot[2]=[3]+[2]=[3+2]=[5]$$
We suppose that $a$ is a square of an integer, so $a=b^2 \Rightarrow [a]=[b^2]$. So it must be be $[b^2]=[5]$. The possible values of $[b^2]$ are:
$$\left.\begin{matrix}
: & [0] & [1] & [2] & [3] & [4] &[5] & [6] & [7]\\
[b^2]:& [0] &[1] & [4] & [1] &[0] & [1] &[4] & [1]
\end{matrix}\right.$$
Since there is not the value $[5]$, it cannot be true..So $a$ cannot be a square of an integer.

Is this correct? Or can I not just solve this in $\mathbb{Z}_8$?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o I have to show that the number $a=201340168052123987111222893$ is not a square of an integer, without doing calculations.Could I solve this in $\mathbb{Z}_8$?
I mean that the number $a$ can be written as followed:
$$a=3+9 \cdot 10 +8 \cdot 10^2 + 2 \cdot 10^3+...$$
Since at $\mathbb{Z}_8$: $[10]=[2], [10^2]=[4], [10^3]=[8]=[0], [10^k]=[0] \text{ for }k \geq 3$ we have:
$$[a]=[3]+[9] \cdot [10]+[8] \cdot [10^2]+[2] \cdot [10^3]+...=[3]+[1] \cdot[2]=[3]+[2]=[3+2]=[5]$$
We suppose that $a$ is a square of an integer, so $a=b^2 \Rightarrow [a]=[b^2]$. So it must be be $[b^2]=[5]$. The possible values of $[b^2]$ are:
$$\left.\begin{matrix}
: & [0] & [1] & [2] & [3] & [4] &[5] & [6] & [7]\\
[b^2]:& [0] &[1] & [4] & [1] &[0] & [1] &[4] & [1]
\end{matrix}\right.$$
Since there is not the value $[5]$, it cannot be true..So $a$ cannot be a square of an integer.

Is this correct? Or can I not just solve this in $\mathbb{Z}_8$?


Yep. All correct! ;)

Note that it is slightly easier in $\mathbb Z_{10}$.
What are the possibilities for the last digit of any square?
 
As ILS points out, the last digit (in base 10, our usual base system) of a perfect square must be either:

0,1,4,5,6 or 9.

3 is not on this list.
 
I like Serena said:
Yep. All correct! ;)

Note that it is slightly easier in $\mathbb Z_{10}$.
What are the possibilities for the last digit of any square?

Deveno said:
As ILS points out, the last digit (in base 10, our usual base system) of a perfect square must be either:

0,1,4,5,6 or 9.

3 is not on this list.

Ok! Thank you both for your answer! :o
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top