Show That There Is Only One Linear Transformation Proof

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
mmmboh
Messages
401
Reaction score
0
Show That There Is Only One Linear Transformation Proof Help Please!

Hi, I have been trying this problem for a couple of days, I have done a proof but I don't know if it makes sense. If you want I can scan it and show it, but if someone can show me how to do it that would be more than amazing, I have midterms coming up soon :confused:

359eddl.jpg


Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Haha... I'm going to assume you are in my class because this is on my assignment for this week!

I had difficulty with it too but I found this which was immensely helpful.

Scroll down to proposition 8.3. In the proof they talk about proposition 4.1, which we proved on a previous assignment.

Hope that helps :)
 

Attachments



Hey thanks a lot that cleared things up!
 


Suppse there were two such transformations, [itex]T_1[/itex] and [itex]T_2[/itex] [itex]T_1\ne T_2[/itex]. Any vector v can be written in terms of the basis vectors, [itex]v= a_1v_1+ a_2v_2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_nv_n[/itex].

Then [itex]T_1(v)=[/itex][itex]T_1(a_1v_1+ a_2v_2+[/itex][itex]\cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_nv_n)= T_1(a_1v_1)+ T_1(a_2v_2)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ T_1(a_nv_n)[/itex][itex]a_1T_1(v_1)+ a_2T_1(v_2)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_nT_1(v_n)[/itex][itex]= a_1w_1+ a_2w_2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_nw_n[/itex].

Also [itex]T_2(v)= T_2(a_1v_1+ a_2v_2+[/itex][itex]\cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_nv_n)= T_2(a_1v_1)+ T_2(a_2v_2)+[/itex][itex]\cdot\cdot\cdot+ T_2(a_nv_n)= a_1T_1(v_1)+ a_2T_2(v_2)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_nT_2(v_n)[/itex][itex]= a_1w_1+ a_2w_2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_nw_n[/itex].

That is, for any vector, v, [itex]T_1(v)= T_2(v)[/itex] contradicting the assumption that [itex]T_1\ne T_2[/itex].
 
Last edited by a moderator: