Showing that Yang-Mills equations transform homogeneousy

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter center o bass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transform Yang-mills
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
Hi! I'm trying to show that the differential from equation
$$D \star F = 0$$ transform homogeneously under the adjoint action ##F \mapsto gFg^{-1}## of the lie group ##G##, where ##D## denotes the covariant exterior derivative ##D\alpha = d \alpha + A \wedge \alpha## for some lie algebra valued form ##\alpha##. Since
$$A \mapsto gAg^{-1} + gdg^{-1}$$
we get
$$D\star F \mapsto d(g\star Fg^{-1}) + (A \mapsto gAg^{-1} + gdg^{-1})\wedge \star F = dg \wedge \star F g^{-1} + g d\star F g^{-1} + g \star F \wedge dg^{-1} + g A \wedge \star F g^{-1} + g dg^{-1} \wedge g^{-1} \star F g^{-1}$$
where if we use that ##gdg^{-1} = - (dg) g^{-1}##, then the last term seem to cancel the first. However, if this is correct, then the third term has to be zero.

Is the third term zero, and if so why?

Am I going wrong somewhere else?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
center o bass said:
Hi! I'm trying to show that the differential from equation
$$D \star F = 0$$ transform homogeneously under the adjoint action ##F \mapsto gFg^{-1}## of the lie group ##G##, where ##D## denotes the covariant exterior derivative ##D\alpha = d \alpha + A \wedge \alpha## for some lie algebra valued form ##\alpha##. Since
$$A \mapsto gAg^{-1} + gdg^{-1}$$
we get
$$D\star F \mapsto d(g\star Fg^{-1}) + (A \mapsto gAg^{-1} + gdg^{-1})\wedge \star F = dg \wedge \star F g^{-1} + g d\star F g^{-1} + g \star F \wedge dg^{-1} + g A \wedge \star F g^{-1} + g dg^{-1} \wedge g^{-1} \star F g^{-1}$$
where if we use that ##gdg^{-1} = - (dg) g^{-1}##, then the last term seem to cancel the first. However, if this is correct, then the third term has to be zero.

Is the third term zero, and if so why?

Am I going wrong somewhere else?

Let me try it out :)
[itex]D \star F=0[/itex]
or
[itex]d \star F + A \wedge \star F = 0[/itex]

Now make the mappings of [itex]D \star F[/itex]...

[itex]d(g \star Fg^{-1}) + (gAg^{-1} + g dg^{-1}) \wedge \star gFg^{-1}[/itex]

I think here we reach different results... ?
I can't continue because I am not sure what star means... and I am not really familiar with the wedges...
 
I'll try to answer using very very old notes; hope the signs and details a correct. I start w/o using forms. I think the problem is not in the exterior derivative but in the su(n) part. In the following F and A are su(N) matrices, g is an SU(N) group element and the commutators [.,.] always refer to the su(N) matrices.

We have the following transformations:

[tex]A_\mu \to A_\mu^\prime = g\,(A_\mu + i\partial_\mu)\,g^\dagger[/tex]
[tex]F_{\mu\nu} \to F_{\mu\nu}^\prime = g\,F_{\mu\nu}\,g^\dagger[/tex]

As far as I remember the covariant derivative of F is defined as

[tex](DF)^\nu = \partial_\mu F^{\mu\nu} - i [A_\mu,F^{\mu\nu}][/tex]

Now we have to check the transformation properties of DF:

[tex](DF)^\nu \to {(DF)^\prime}^\nu = \partial_\mu (g\,F^{\mu\nu}\,g^\dagger) -i[g\,A_\mu\,g^\dagger + ig\,\partial_\mu\,g^\dagger, g\,F^{\mu\nu}\,g^\dagger][/tex]

I hope this Ansatz helps ...
 
Last edited: