Significant Figures and speed of a runner

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a runner based on given times and distance, specifically focusing on the application of significant figures in the final answer.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore how to apply significant figure rules to the calculated speed, questioning whether to round to 1 or 2 significant figures based on the provided data.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the appropriate number of significant figures to use in the final answer, with some participants suggesting that common sense may lead to a different conclusion than strict adherence to rules. Multiple interpretations of the data's accuracy are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the times are measured to the nearest 5 seconds, and the distance is a fixed measurement, which raises questions about the accuracy and significance of these figures in the context of the problem.

Bohring
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the speed of the runner.

Times, measured to nearest 5 seconds: 95, 100, 85, 80 seconds.
Mean Time: 90 seconds.

Distance: 200m

Homework Equations


Speed = Distance/Time

The Attempt at a Solution


Speed = Distance/Time = 200/90 = 2.2222222222 ms-1

Not sure how many significant figures I should put my answer to, though?
Is it just 2 ms-1, as the times are to 0dp, or is it 2.2 ms-1, as the least accurate time is to 2 sig fig?

Cheers!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
tomself1 said:

Homework Statement



Calculate the speed of the runner.

Times, measured to nearest 5 seconds: 95, 100, 85, 80 seconds.
Mean Time: 90 seconds.

Distance: 200m


Homework Equations


Speed = Distance/Time


The Attempt at a Solution


Speed = Distance/Time = 200/90 = 2.2222222222 ms-1

Not sure how many significant figures I should put my answer to, though?
Is it just 2 ms-1, as the times are to 0dp, or is it 2.2 ms-1, as the least accurate time is to 2 sig fig?

Cheers!
Significant figure rules are sometimes confusing, but since the least number of sig figures is one (both 200 and 90 have just one significant figure), then the answer is 2 m/s.
 
Hi jay! :smile:
PhanthomJay said:
Significant figure rules are sometimes confusing, but since the least number of sig figures is one (both 200 and 90 have just one significant figure), then the answer is 2 m/s.

Are you sure?

I get very confused by the sig figs rules (which is why I waited for someone else to reply first :redface:), but does it matter about 200 and 90 having one sig fig?

The 200m is presumably on a measured track, and those tend to be accurate to within a cm or so.

And the 90 is the exact mean of the four given times, so it's not rounded at all.

It seems to me (applying common-sense rather than the rules) that since the time is "measured to nearest 5 seconds", it's accurate to about 1 in 20, which would be about 0.1 in 2.222… , giving an answer of 2.2.

And the individual speeds (using only one time each) would range from 2.0 exactly to 2.5 exactly, so choosing 2 as the mean speed seems to have lost a lot of information.

Anyone else got any ideas? :confused:
 
I changed my mind :wink:. As you noted, the runner's speed varies from 2 m/s (at 100 sec) to 2.5 m/s (at 80 sec); that wouldn't be right to call the runner's speed 2 m/s. So I would say you are correct, 2.2 m/s would be the answer. Significant figures is not my forte, that's for sure...common sense makes more sense:smile:
 
The most number of sig figs in this problem is 3 there fore your answer should be rounded to 2 sig figs also. If your answer is correct then your would answer should be 2.2. Even though i was taught hat there are no significant figures in physics only in chem?
 
Thanks for your help everyone! I'm normally okay with things like this, but the more I thought about it, the more I got confused!

I was always taught to put your answer to the same number of sig figs as your least accurate piece of data. In this case, it's 1 sig fig, but as you say, it seems like you're losing a lot of information!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K