How to Write #s w/ Uncertainty: Rules & Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Significant figures
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The correct representation of a measured value with uncertainty involves aligning the significant figures of the principal value with those of the uncertainty. For a principal value of 1427 with an uncertainty of 150, the appropriate notation is (1.43±0.15)x10³. If the uncertainty is rounded to one significant figure, the representation changes to (1.4±0.2)x10³. Additionally, when dealing with values like 154.3464 and an uncertainty of 0.003, the correct format is 154.346±0.003, ensuring the last digits align properly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of significant figures in scientific notation
  • Familiarity with uncertainty representation in measurements
  • Knowledge of rounding rules for significant figures
  • Basic principles of scientific notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the rules for significant figures in measurements
  • Learn about rounding uncertainties in scientific contexts
  • Explore the use of scientific notation in reporting measurements
  • Investigate best practices for documenting uncertainties in research papers
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, researchers reporting experimental data, and professionals involved in scientific measurement and analysis.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
I am having a little trouble to write in the right way a number:

I did a calc in which the uncertainty was 150, while the value with physics meaning was about to 1427.

I am trying to figure out what is the right way to write it.
Now, since the uncertainty can not have more than two significant figure, my guess would be:

$$1.4*10^3 \pm 1.5*10^2$$

My doubt is about the first number, what are the rules about it? The same number of significant figures that uncertainty has? But normally if the uncertainty is, let's say, "0.003" and the value measured "154.3464". I would write $$154.346 \pm 0.003$$ and i am almost sure this is right, but it does not have the same quantity of significant figures. I am confused
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The last digits of the value and the uncertainty should align, so maybe

$$1.43*10^3 \pm 1.5*10^2$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist
Herculi said:
Homework Statement:: .
Relevant Equations:: .

I am having a little trouble to write in the right way a number:

I did a calc in which the uncertainty was 150, while the value with physics meaning was about to 1427.

I am trying to figure out what is the right way to write it.
Now, since the uncertainty can not have more than two significant figure, my guess would be:

$$1.4*10^3 \pm 1.5*10^2$$

My doubt is about the first number, what are the rules about it? The same number of significant figures that uncertainty has? But normally if the uncertainty is, let's say, "0.003" and the value measured "154.3464". I would write $$154.346 \pm 0.003$$ and i am almost sure this is right, but it does not have the same quantity of significant figures. I am confused
Sorry, answer is a bit long.

In standard form, principal value is:
1427 = 1.427*10³.

Uncertainties are generally rounded to one, or sometimes two, significant figures. It depends on your local practice. Here I’d use two. Matching the principal value's power of 10, the uncertainty (150) is expressed as:
0.15*10³.

The initial combined result is (1.427±0.15)x10³. Now round the precision (not the signficant figures) of the principal value to match the precision of the uncertainty. This gives the final answer of:
(1.43±0.15)x10³.

You also could write this as 1430±150.

Of course you can do all that in one step.
___________

If you are required to round uncertainty to one significant figure, the answer would be;
(1.4±0.2)x10³

This could also be written as 1400±200.
___________

If the principal value is 154.3464 and the uncertainty is 0.003, then 154.346±0.003 is correct. You could also write it as (1.54346±0.00003)x10² but that’s rather clumsy.

And don’t forget units!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K