Simple Collisions Question Solution | Conservation of Momentum

  • Thread starter Thread starter hasnain721
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collisions
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to simple collisions and the conservation of momentum, involving calculations of gravitational potential energy and momentum before and after a collision.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to solve for gravitational potential energy and momentum, raising questions about the correctness of their mass value used in calculations. Other participants question the mass conversion and seek clarification on the results for part c.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing feedback on calculations and confirming the original poster's understanding of part c. There is no explicit consensus, but some guidance has been offered regarding the mass conversion.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted discrepancy in the mass value used in the momentum calculations, which some participants suggest should be adjusted. The original poster's results for part c are also under discussion.

hasnain721
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] simple collisions question

Homework Statement



http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/1253/28157442gm4.jpg


Homework Equations



√(2gh)

The Attempt at a Solution



a)


Gravitational potential energy = kinetic energy

this gives u

√(2gh)

= 0.815 metres


b)
i)
In a closed system, total momentum is always conserved.

ii)

Momentum before = momentum after


momentum before :
mass X velocity
(80/100) kg X 4 m/s = 0.32kgm/s

momentum after :
mass X velocity
((80/100) X 3) kg X x = 0.32 kgm/s

therefore x = 1.33 m/s

Is that rite?


and for c) :

ah i get it now!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
All is fine up to the momentum calculations where you use (80/100) as the mass. This should be (80/1000) or (8/100). You seem to have the right value for the momentum though so that's probably just a typo. What did you get for part c?

EDIT: Just noticed you've solved it.
 
Kurdt said:
All is fine up to the momentum calculations where you use (80/100) as the mass. This should be (80/1000) or (8/100). What did you get for part c?

oh yes srry! for part c i got : 2.67 seconds is tht rite?
 
hasnain721 said:
oh yes srry! for part c i got : 2.67 seconds is tht rite?

Looks fine to me.
 
Kurdt said:
Looks fine to me.

cheers!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K