Simple existence/uniqueness proof for Newton's 2nd?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fredrik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Messages
10,876
Reaction score
423
Is there a simple proof of the existence and uniqueness of a solution of [itex]x''(t)=f(x'(t),x(t),t)[/itex], where f is an appropriately "nice" function? (Given an initial condition [itex]x(t_0)=x_0,\ x'(t_0)=v_0[/itex], or a boundary condition [itex]x(t_0)=x_0,\ x(t_1)=x_1[/itex]).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's called Picard's theorem. It relates to first order differential equations, but through using vectors can solve a system of them. Any second order differential equation can be turned into a system of first order differential equations by the following (using your differential equation as the starting point)

[tex]z_1(t)=x(t)[/tex] and [tex]z_2(t)=x'(t)[/tex] we get

[tex]z_1'(t)=z_2(t)[/tex]

and

[tex]z_2'(t)=f(z_1(t), z_2(t),t)[/tex]

Here's a wikipedia link to the theorem
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picard–Lindelöf_theorem
 
Thanks. I've seen references to Picard's theorem and I own a book that proves it, but I thought it was more general than that. I was hoping that there would exist a theorem with a particularly simple proof that covers the cases that are interesting for physics, but I guess not.

What theorem do we use when we've been given boundary conditions instead of an initial condition? There's still a unique solution, right?
 
When you're given boundary conditions it's a lot tougher. I forgot to mention a general technique for solving odes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_of_variation_of_parameters

But you can have problems. Let's take the easy equation [tex]y''+y=0[/tex]. So [tex]y=Acos(x)+Bsin(x)[/tex]. Let's furthermore take the boundary conditions [tex]y(0)=0[/tex] and [tex]y(\pi)=0[/tex]. Then all we get is that the solution is something of the form [tex]y=Asin(x)[/tex]

If instead we had [tex]y(0)=0[/tex] and [tex]y(\pi)=1[/tex] there would be no solution.