Simple test for harmful chemicals in food

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods for detecting harmful chemicals in food, focusing on simple tests that can be performed in a standard laboratory setting. Participants explore various types of harmful chemicals, their effects, and the techniques available for their detection.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about different ways to detect harmful chemicals in food, seeking at least five tests suitable for a chemistry investigatory project.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the types of harmful chemicals and suggests searching online for information related to food poisoning and contamination.
  • A participant discusses the broad range of chemicals that could be considered harmful, including hormone analogs, neurotransmitter analogs, metabolic blockers, and heavy metal ions, emphasizing the complexity of food chemistry.
  • This participant also outlines the two-step process of separation and identification of chemicals, mentioning various methods such as chromatography and spectroscopy.
  • In response, another participant clarifies that they are looking for simple tests for easily detectable chemicals, regardless of their effects on health.
  • A later reply introduces the concept of hormesis, suggesting that the harmfulness of a chemical is dependent on its dose.
  • Another participant reiterates the request for simple tests to identify chemicals in common food items like fruits and vegetables.
  • Two participants mention a deadline for completing the tests, indicating urgency in the discussion.
  • A final comment questions the relevance of the thread due to the missed deadline, suggesting it may no longer be pertinent.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on what constitutes "harmful" chemicals and the complexity of detection methods. There is no consensus on specific tests or the definition of harmfulness, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to identifying chemicals in food.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in defining harmful chemicals and the challenges in detecting them due to the complexity of food matrices and varying sensitivities among individuals.

Space Knight
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
You have to show your attempts at solving the question to receive help. This is a forum policy.
What are the different ways to detect harmful chemicals in food? I need to find at least 5 tests for different chemicals for my chemistry investigatory for my final exams. I have only chemicals available in a standard lab in my hand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What kinds of harmful chemicals that can appear in the food do you know? Have you tried to google them? Or just to google "food poisoning"? "Mass food poisioning"? "Food contamination"?
 
I presume that by "harmful" in this context, you mean some toxic effect when eaten. Toxic effects are caused by interaction of that the chemical has with various vital parts of the human body. This can potentially include a large number of chemical compounds. Categories include hormone analogs like BPA (bisphenol A), neurotransmitter analogs like organophosphate nerve gases, metabolic blockers (carbon monoxide, cyanide, nitrophenol), ion channel blockers (digitalis glycosides, tetrodotoxin), protein-binding heavy metal ions (arsenic, mercury. lead etc) and many, many more.
So, I think the question is phrased in a confusing way. I think you are being asked to generate a list of tools that might be used by a forensic or food scientist to identify components of food. This clearly involves two steps: separation and identification. The separation methods include extraction: liquid-liquid partitioning between an organic and aqueous phase is common for organic molecules (often with the pH of the aqueous phase adjusted), chelation to remove ions (e.g. EDTA to remove chromium) and a host of chromatography methods: liquid on solid, gas chromatography, High Pressure Liquid Chromatography. Once components are separated, there are many identification methods: specific chemical tests ((Marsh Test for arsenic, prussian blue test for cyanide, Meixner test for amanitin), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, mass spectroscopy, light absorption spectroscopy (IR, UV). The separation and identification steps are sometimes combined (HPLC or GC with mass spectroscopy).
Because food is a pretty heterogeneous mixture of chemicals that we have proven don't generally cause harm, you would have to compare your results of separation and identification with a database of harmful chemicals. It would still be difficult since there are some "harmful" constituents of normal foods present in sub-toxic amounts (e.g. hydrogen cyanide releasing chemicals in peach pits and apple seeds, arsenic in rice) and some people are sensitive to normal food constituents (e.g. food allergies, people with genetic glucose-6-phosphatase deficiency develop hemolytic anemia from eating fava beans, chemicals in raw navy beans (lectins) bind proteins causing gastrointestinal toxicity).
Hope this lengthy diatribe helps (I am a physician and former organic chemist).
 
Actually by harmful I mean the simplest chemicals that can be detect using simple lab techniques which cause simple or complex unwanted effects in the body. as long as the tests are simple I don't care what effects they cause.
 
Remember a principal of hormesis, it's not the drug but the dose. Chemicals are harmful only in adequate quantity. The Square of Opposition logic is very interesting.
 
Please, even if it is not harmful in small measures, give me some tests which are simple enough to find out some chemicals in food items like vegetables, fruits, etc. that we get from the farms.
 
I need to finish the tests by 17 march 2015 4:00 IST
 
Space Knight said:
I need to finish the tests by 17 march 2015 4:00 IST

As you are already almost a month past the deadline isn't this thread a moot?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davidbenari

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
52
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K