Simplification in Schrodinger derivation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the Schrödinger equation from the Klein-Gordon equation, specifically addressing the approximation of relativistic total energy. The key equation discussed is E = mc²√(1 + p²/m²c²), which simplifies to mc²(1 + 1/2 p²/m²c²) using the binomial approximation. The participant expresses confusion regarding the origin of the 1/2 factor and the method of removing the square root. The use of tools like WolframAlpha for visualizing the approximation is also highlighted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Klein-Gordon equation
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger equation
  • Knowledge of binomial approximation techniques
  • Basic concepts of relativistic energy equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Klein-Gordon equation in detail
  • Learn about the binomial approximation and its applications in physics
  • Explore visualizations of energy equations using WolframAlpha
  • Investigate the implications of relativistic effects on quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and relativistic equations, as well as educators seeking to clarify the derivation of the Schrödinger equation.

TheFerruccio
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
This is not a homework question. This is not for a course. However, I got a warning for posting such questions elsewhere, so, I suppose I must post them here.

Homework Statement


The following is an excerpt of the derivation of the Schrödinger equation. After deriving the Klein-Gordon equation, the relativistic total energy is approximated to arrive at the Schrödinger equation.

Homework Equations



E = mc^2\sqrt{1+\frac{p^2}{m^2c^2}}
\approx mc^2\left(1+\frac{1}{2}\frac{p^2}{m^2c^2}\right)

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, frankly, I do not see how they went from the first step to the second step. Where did the 1/2 come from? How does the removal of the square root effectively approximate this? I am not seeing it. Was a conjugate used and multiplied somehow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It may also help you to play around with some of these plots to get a feel for how well the approximations work. For example, letting ##x = p/(mc)##, take a look at a comparison of the two curves, plotted with wolframalpha:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Plot[{Sqrt[1+x^2],1+x^2/2},{x,0,1}]

Play around with some other examples of the binomial approximation as well.
 
Thank you! This is perfect. I do not know how I managed to get this far without having heard of the binomial approximation, and having tutored math for years. I guess I am one of the lucky ten thousand.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K