1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Simplifying surds as numerators

  1. Sep 29, 2011 #1
    Hi,

    I was reading about surds and saw this:

    [PLAIN]http://www.mattvonfat.com/eq.png [Broken]

    I'm probably not as familiar with simplifying fractions as I should be but I think I get that it's being split in to two fractions and that √3/2 is the same as 1/2*√3 but I don't understand what's actually being done to √3/2 to simplify it and why the original expression isn't left as it is.

    Any help would be much appreciated!

    Thanks,
    Matt
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 29, 2011 #2
    Nothing wrong with either form of the expression.
    Usually we eliminate roots from denominators.
    Numerators with roots are fine.
     
  4. Sep 29, 2011 #3
    it might help to think of it like this:

    2/3 - 1/3 = (2-1)/3

    So reverse would be the same:

    (2-1)/3 = 2/3 - 1/3

    if 3 were negative, then the negatives would evaluate:

    (2-1)/-3 = 2/-3 - 1/-3 = -2/3 - (-1/3) = -2/3 + 1/3
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Simplifying surds as numerators
  1. Surd Problem (Replies: 4)

  2. Added surds (Replies: 7)

  3. Laplacing the surd (Replies: 2)

Loading...