Simplifying surds as numerators

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MattVonFat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplifying
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
MattVonFat
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was reading about surds and saw this:

[PLAIN]http://www.mattvonfat.com/eq.png

I'm probably not as familiar with simplifying fractions as I should be but I think I get that it's being split into two fractions and that √3/2 is the same as 1/2*√3 but I don't understand what's actually being done to √3/2 to simplify it and why the original expression isn't left as it is.

Any help would be much appreciated!

Thanks,
Matt
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Nothing wrong with either form of the expression.
Usually we eliminate roots from denominators.
Numerators with roots are fine.
 
it might help to think of it like this:

2/3 - 1/3 = (2-1)/3

So reverse would be the same:

(2-1)/3 = 2/3 - 1/3

if 3 were negative, then the negatives would evaluate:

(2-1)/-3 = 2/-3 - 1/-3 = -2/3 - (-1/3) = -2/3 + 1/3