Simulating Core Drops: Cement Cubes at Gulf of Mexico Oil Conduits

  • Thread starter Thread starter cph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core Drop
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the simulation of core drops using a 10x10x10 ft cement cube to seal oil and gas conduits in the Gulf of Mexico. The proposed method involves dropping the cube from a height of 2000 ft, potentially achieving a velocity of approximately 700 mph for about 2 seconds. The intent is to collapse the soft metal casing of the conduit by utilizing the non-compressible nature of water to push sediment into the conduit, effectively sealing it. The discussion also draws parallels to theoretical core drops, such as those involving planetesimals and black holes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics, particularly the properties of non-compressible and compressible fluids.
  • Familiarity with the mechanics of dropping heavy objects from significant heights.
  • Knowledge of sedimentary geology and the behavior of sediments under pressure.
  • Basic principles of impact physics and velocity calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact dynamics of large objects in fluid environments.
  • Study the properties of non-compressible fluids and their applications in engineering.
  • Explore sediment behavior under dynamic loading conditions.
  • Investigate theoretical models of core drops in astrophysics, particularly regarding planetesimals and black hole coalescence.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, geologists, physicists, and researchers interested in fluid dynamics, sedimentology, and theoretical astrophysics will benefit from this discussion.

cph
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
As previously described,* might one drop a 10x10x10 ft cement cube at 15-20 ft from Gulf of Mexico oil/gas conduit. The intent is to seal up such conduit extending down ~1000 ft below sediment surface. The non-compressible fluid collapsing and sealing soft metal casing and compressible gaseous fluid interior. What might be the velocity of such core drop; and might it extend even through the formation? Might this constitute a simulation for ANY core drop, such as for iron inner core of planetesimal hitting proto-earth? Likewise for final core drop of coalescing black holes? Scaling up of mass would not seem relevant for such core drops. Thus might the velocity of core drop be ~700+ mph for say 2 seconds for at 2000 ft water depth?

* CUBIC BLOCK

Make 10 ft sided cubic block (1000 cu ft) of concrete on platform. Then drop such block 2000 ft (10 secs?), which might penetrate 1000 ft(?) into water soaked sediments. Drop it slightly off target, so that sub-mud surface conduit collapses shut. Water is non-compressible fluid, whereas gas in conduit is a compressible fluid. So the cubic block would push muck over into conduit, collapsing it.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
cph said:
As previously described,* might one drop a 10x10x10 ft cement cube at 15-20 ft from Gulf of Mexico oil/gas conduit. The intent is to seal up such conduit extending down ~1000 ft below sediment surface. The non-compressible fluid collapsing and sealing soft metal casing and compressible gaseous fluid interior. What might be the velocity of such core drop; and might it extend even through the formation? Might this constitute a simulation for ANY core drop, such as for iron inner core of planetesimal hitting proto-earth? Likewise for final core drop of coalescing black holes? Scaling up of mass would not seem relevant for such core drops. Thus might the velocity of core drop be ~700+ mph for say 2 seconds for at 2000 ft water depth?

* CUBIC BLOCK

Make 10 ft sided cubic block (1000 cu ft) of concrete on platform. Then drop such block 2000 ft (10 secs?), which might penetrate 1000 ft(?) into water soaked sediments. Drop it slightly off target, so that sub-mud surface conduit collapses shut. Water is non-compressible fluid, whereas gas in conduit is a compressible fluid. So the cubic block would push muck over into conduit, collapsing it.

What exactly is your question?

CS
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K