I Simultaneous measurements of 1 observable

Ghost Quartz
Messages
8
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
some doubts about the measurement of observables
Hi. I'm new to the forum and and I am currently studying quantum mechanics.
According Sakurai, page 24, "When the measurement is performed, the system is" thrown into" one of eigenstates of observable". This raised some questions for me:

Is possible two measurements simultaneous of one observable?
If yes, then will the eigenvalue be equal in both measurements? if they will be the equal, why will they be the equal?

If not, then why not? I do not remember it well, but I believe I have heard somewhere that it is impossible for two photons to interact simultaneously with an electron. Is there any relation?

i am not a graduate student in physics, then I don't know the correct level of this thread. When in doubt I put A, sorry for this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ghost Quartz said:
i am not a graduate student in physics, then I don't know the correct level of this thread. When in doubt I put A, sorry for this.
”I” for general college level is about right, and it’s no problem - just a few mouse clicks to change, probably the most common edit I make.
 
  • Like
Likes Ghost Quartz
Ghost Quartz said:
According Sakurai, page 24, "When the measurement is performed, the system is" thrown into" one of eigenstates of observable". This raised some questions for me:

Is possible two measurements simultaneous of one observable?
If you think of QM as describing nature at an elementary level, then it's not possible. Two observers can independently and simultaneously measure the velocity and position of a car, for example, because the car can be bombarded by light from all directions without significantly changing its position or momentum.

You can't do that to a electron. The position measurement of an electron must be deduced indirectly by the scattering of a single photon, say. That's a whole different game.

The role of measurement in QM is subtle and somewhat problematic. For the time being, I would assume that a system in QM is subject to one measurement at a time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Ghost Quartz
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
984
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
933
Replies
1
Views
812
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top