I Simultaneous measurements of 1 observable

Ghost Quartz
Messages
8
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
some doubts about the measurement of observables
Hi. I'm new to the forum and and I am currently studying quantum mechanics.
According Sakurai, page 24, "When the measurement is performed, the system is" thrown into" one of eigenstates of observable". This raised some questions for me:

Is possible two measurements simultaneous of one observable?
If yes, then will the eigenvalue be equal in both measurements? if they will be the equal, why will they be the equal?

If not, then why not? I do not remember it well, but I believe I have heard somewhere that it is impossible for two photons to interact simultaneously with an electron. Is there any relation?

i am not a graduate student in physics, then I don't know the correct level of this thread. When in doubt I put A, sorry for this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ghost Quartz said:
i am not a graduate student in physics, then I don't know the correct level of this thread. When in doubt I put A, sorry for this.
”I” for general college level is about right, and it’s no problem - just a few mouse clicks to change, probably the most common edit I make.
 
  • Like
Likes Ghost Quartz
Ghost Quartz said:
According Sakurai, page 24, "When the measurement is performed, the system is" thrown into" one of eigenstates of observable". This raised some questions for me:

Is possible two measurements simultaneous of one observable?
If you think of QM as describing nature at an elementary level, then it's not possible. Two observers can independently and simultaneously measure the velocity and position of a car, for example, because the car can be bombarded by light from all directions without significantly changing its position or momentum.

You can't do that to a electron. The position measurement of an electron must be deduced indirectly by the scattering of a single photon, say. That's a whole different game.

The role of measurement in QM is subtle and somewhat problematic. For the time being, I would assume that a system in QM is subject to one measurement at a time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Ghost Quartz
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
986
Replies
1
Views
829
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top