Single Spacing LaTeX TOC: Simple Fix

  • Context: LaTeX 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Latex
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around customizing the spacing of the table of contents (TOC) in a LaTeX document, specifically within the report document class. Participants explore various methods to achieve single or one-and-a-half spacing for the TOC entries while dealing with specific style file constraints and issues related to the automatic generation of the TOC.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a simple method to make the TOC single or one-and-a-half spaced, mentioning issues with the tocloft package and the specific way TOC entries are added.
  • Another participant suggests using \setlength commands in the preamble with tocloft to customize the TOC spacing, noting that the default is single spacing.
  • A participant expresses a desire to avoid using tocloft due to complications it introduces with the existing style file, which manages TOC formatting.
  • One participant proposes creating a custom \tableofcontents macro to enforce single spacing, but notes that this solution is untested.
  • Another participant questions whether the TOC is not being generated automatically, which might affect the spacing outcome.
  • There is a suggestion to set the entire document to single space and then switch to double space for the body, which is noted as an unusual approach.
  • A participant discovers that specific code in their style file is responsible for changing spacing in the TOC, indicating a lack of awareness of its effects prior to this realization.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding how TOC entries are printed and the independence of TOC spacing from the rest of the document's spacing settings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to customize TOC spacing, with no consensus reached on a definitive solution. Some participants advocate for using specific packages, while others prefer to work within the constraints of their existing style files.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the specific style file being used, the manual addition of TOC entries, and the potential impact of various commands on TOC formatting. There is also mention of the independence of TOC spacing from the main document's spacing settings.

Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
I'm running in the report document class and I was wondering how does one make the table of contents single spaced? Or possibly even 1 1/2 spaced. I tried some suggestions involving the tocloft package and everything pretty much went to hell. Due to some annoying issues with how the theses need to be done (I hate my university), the table of contents is created by

\chapter*{Chapter name}
\addcontents{toc}{chapter}{Chapter name}

Does anyone know a simple way to single space or 1 1/2 space the entries in the TOC?

Do I need to provide anymore info?

The style file I use has something about the table of contents as

Code:
 \def\tableofcontents{\@restonecolfalse\if@twocolumn\@restonecoltrue\onecolumn
 \fi \chapter*{TABLE OF CONTENTS\@mkboth{CONTENTS}{CONTENTS}}
 \@starttoc{toc}\if@restonecol\twocolumn\fi}

but I'm a bit clueless as to what's going on there :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\setlength in the preamble with tocloft is the usual way to customize TOC without editing the style.

The \LeTeX default is single space though - oh but you have a TOC with only chapter headings?

Code:
\documentclass{book}
\usepackage{tocloft}

\setlength\cftparskip{-2pt}
\setlength\cftbeforechapskip{0pt}

\begin{document}
\tableofcontents
\clearpage

\chapter{Test chapter one}
\chapter{Test chapter two}

\end{document}
 
I have chapters and sections :) The thesis is mainly double spaced so I declared double spacing at the very beginning of everything.

I really want to avoid using tocloft because the style file I'm using does it's own stuff to the table of contents. Tocloft makes my headings for the TOC, LOF, and LOT go a bit crazy.
 
Pengwuino said:
The style file I use has something about the table of contents as

Code:
\def\tableofcontents{\@restonecolfalse\if@twocolumn\@restonecoltrue\onecolumn
 \fi \chapter*{TABLE OF CONTENTS\@mkboth{CONTENTS}{CONTENTS}}
 \@starttoc{toc}\if@restonecol\twocolumn\fi}

but I'm a bit clueless as to what's going on there :)
It's forcing the table of contents to be single column even if the document proper is two column.

So write your own \tableofcontents macro that uses this given table of contents command. NOTE WELL: THIS IS NOT TESTED:
Code:
\let\@saved@tableofcontents\tableofcontents
\def\tableofcontents{\begingroup\singlespace\@saved@tableofcontents\endgroup}
 
I assume I put that after the first part that I posted? I'm pretty clueless about latex :P

I put it after and I noticed the TOC shifted but was still double spaced.

Could it be because the TOC isn't being generated automatically as expected and instead is being compiled with \addcontents{toc}{chapter}{blahblahblah}?
 
Oh now I get you - you want to start out single space for the toc and switch to double-space for the body. That would be quite unusual as a standard, which is probably why the style doesn't support it.

How about set the document to single-space and :

\usepackage{setspace}

Then switch between different spacing options with:

\doublespacing
\singlespacing
\onehalfspacing

For other sizes use the \setstretch command like this:

\setstretch{1.8}

Double-spacing is usually only used in drafts - which is often what is requested for marking. The actual paper would use a different format.
 
Thanks for the help guys. I just realized some code after that going as

Code:
 \def\l@chapter{\par
                \baselineskip 0.15in  % added for smaller spacing
                \@dottedtocline{1}{0.0em}{2.6em}}
 \def\l@section{\baselineskip 0..15in  % added for smaller spacing
                \@dottedtocline{1}{2.6em}{2.3em}}
 \def\l@subsection{\baselineskip 0..15in  % added for smaller spacing
                   \@dottedtocline{2}{4.9em}{3.2em}}
 \def\l@subsubsection{\baselineskip 0.20in  % added for smaller spacing
                     \@dottedtocline{3}{8.1em}{4.1em}}
 \def\l@paragraph{\baselineskip 0.20in  % added for smaller spacing
                 \@dottedtocline{4}{12.2em}{5em}}
 \def\l@subparagraph{\baselineskip 0.20in  % added for smaller spacing
                    \@dottedtocline{5}{17.2em}{6em}}

was responsible for changing the spacing upon adding things to the TOC. I didn't really see anything that made me think it was doing anything to the TOC, but apparently it is :)
 
Pengwuino said:
I just realized some code after that going as...

Yup, that's the right place to be. If you do
Code:
\addcontents{toc}{foo}{...}
the TOC entry is printed by the command
Code:
\l@foo

There's nothing special about using format identifiers like "chapter", "section" etc, except those are what the \chapter{...} and \section{...} commands generate for free. If you want to do something really fancy (like including short chapter summaries in the contents or whatever) you might want to define some additional formats.

The spacing of the TOC is (almost) completely independent of the spacing of the rest of the document, so \singlespace etc won't change anything.

I didn't really see anything that made me think it was doing anything to the TOC
Look at your .toc file, then read the code of \contentsline (assuming your packages haven't renamed it as something else). \contentsline is what makes the parameter "foo" execute the command \l@foo.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K