MHB Solution: What is Decomposable Tensor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sudharaka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensors
Sudharaka
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone, :)

Here's a question I am trying to solve at the moment. I want to know what is meant by decomposable in this context. Really appreciate any input. :)

Problem:

Let \(V\) be a vector space over a field \(F\), \(\{e_1,\,e_2,\,\cdots,\,e_n\}\) a basis in \(V\) and \(\{e^1,\,\cdots,\,e^n\}\) adjoint basis in \(V^*\). Which of the following tensors, given by their coordinates are decomposable:

a) \[t^k_{ij}=2^{i+j+k^2}\]

b) \[t^{ij}=i+j\]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know for sure, but I'm guessing that a decomposable tensor would be what I would call a rank-one tensor, in other words one of the form $x\otimes y$ for some $x\in V$, $y\in V^*$. (One of those two given tensors has rank 1, the other one does not.)
 
Opalg said:
I don't know for sure, but I'm guessing that a decomposable tensor would be what I would call a rank-one tensor, in other words one of the form $x\otimes y$ for some $x\in V$, $y\in V^*$. (One of those two given tensors has rank 1, the other one does not.)

Thanks for the reply, but isn't \(t^{k}_{ij}\) a rank three tensor and \(t^{ij}\) a rank two tensor. Sorry, but I am new to tensors and I always view the rank as the number of indices. :)
 
Sudharaka said:
Thanks for the reply, but isn't \(t^{k}_{ij}\) a rank three tensor and \(t^{ij}\) a rank two tensor. Sorry, but I am new to tensors and I always view the rank as the number of indices. :)
One of the difficulties with tensor products is that they crop up in very different contexts and people use different notations and terminology. I think of a tensor $t^{ij}$ as being represented by a matrix. When I call it a rank-one tensor I am thinking of the rank of the associated matrix, which is obviously different from your usage of the word "rank" here.

The reason that I instinctively feel that your tensor $t_{ij}^k = 2^{i+j+k^2}$ is decomposable is that it "decomposes" as a product $t_{ij}^k = 2^{i}\times2^{j+k^2}$. But since I am unsure about the notation you are using, I won't attempt to say more.
 
Opalg said:
One of the difficulties with tensor products is that they crop up in very different contexts and people use different notations and terminology. I think of a tensor $t^{ij}$ as being represented by a matrix. When I call it a rank-one tensor I am thinking of the rank of the associated matrix, which is obviously different from your usage of the word "rank" here.

The reason that I instinctively feel that your tensor $t_{ij}^k = 2^{i+j+k^2}$ is decomposable is that it "decomposes" as a product $t_{ij}^k = 2^{i}\times2^{j+k^2}$. But since I am unsure about the notation you are using, I won't attempt to say more.

I understand this completely. So is it that we can think of any tensor as a matrix? I mean even if the there are three or more indices?
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top