MHB Solve 2^3x+1=32: Find X Using Logs

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackfriars
  • Start date Start date
blackfriars
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
hi could anyone show me the steps for solving this equation
i thought it was to be solved by logs
find X if 2^3x+1=32
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
blackfriars said:
hi could anyone show me the steps for solving this equation
i thought it was to be solved by logs
find X if 2^3x+1=32

Is the equation:

$$2^{3x}+1=32$$

Or:

$$2^{3x+1}=32$$

I suspect it is the latter, but I want to be sure first. :)
 
the answer i got for X was 5 just by using algebra
yes it is the latter equation
thanks
 
$$2^{3x+1}=32=2^5$$

$$3x+1=5\implies x=\frac43$$
 
Could you show steps for solving for x
Thanks

- - - Updated - - -

Yeah i got it now cheers mate
 
$$3x+1=5$$

Subtract $1$ from both sides:

$$3x+1-1=5-1$$

$$3x=4$$

Divide both sides by $3$:

$$x=\frac43$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
974
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top