Solve a Branching Process: Xn & F(s) - Get Help Now!

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tranquillity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Process
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to branching processes, specifically focusing on the size of the nth generation (Xn) and the probability generating function (pgf) of the offspring distribution (F(s)). Participants seek hints and guidance on how to proceed with a proof related to these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests hints on how to prove a statement regarding branching processes, indicating a need for assistance with their proof.
  • Another participant suggests retyping the attempt using LaTeX for clarity, emphasizing the importance of showing effort in the discussion.
  • A participant expresses a preference for receiving hints while continuing to upload handwritten attempts to illustrate their thought process and specific problems.
  • One participant advises against conditioning by X1 and suggests conditioning by X_{n-1} instead, providing a method to express the expectation of a product related to the proof.
  • A participant claims to have resolved their issue by conditioning on X1 as required by the exercise and expresses gratitude for the assistance received.
  • Two participants encourage sharing the completed proof, noting its potential usefulness to others, while one humorously states they do not personally need it.
  • A later reply offers a suggestion that conditions on a similar concept, indicating a willingness to provide further help based on the original poster's understanding of the shared material.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for hints and collaborative problem-solving, but there are differing opinions on the appropriate conditioning variable to use in the proof, with some preferring X1 and others suggesting X_{n-1}. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to the proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying preferences for how to present their work and seek assistance, indicating a reliance on specific conditioning methods that may not be universally applicable. There is also an emphasis on the importance of showing work to facilitate discussion.

Tranquillity
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I attach the following question about branching processes. Xn is the size of the nth generation. F(s) is the pgf of Z, the offspring distribution.

Any hints/help on how to proceed with my proof would be greatly appreciated!

Regards
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Your attachment shows your attempt which is great because people don't usually help without seeing effort. Might I suggest though trying to retype your attempt in a new post using Latex? You can take a look at http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?27-How-to-use-LaTeX-on-this-site to see how to use Latex on MHB.

Jameson
 
The suggestion is good, though this question involves a proof and a lot of notation is involved, I would prefer to get hints and continue uploading my handwritten attempts, to show every time exactly what I think and where I have a problem.

Are you able to help me with the exact question? Thanks!

Regards
 
Hello,

A bit late, but I can answer. Don't condition by X_1, but by X_{n-1}. Then note that S_n=\sum_{i=1}^{X_{n-1}} Z_i^{(n)} to write the expectation of a product : E\left[\prod_{i=1}^{X_{n-1}} s^{Z_i^{(n)}}\bigg|X_{n-1}\right] and finish it off.
 
Hello, thanks for the reply! I have figured it out! I was asked by the exercise to condition on X1. I have finished my proof which conditions on X1. Thanks again :)
 
Well it'd be nice if you shared it with us, for some people may need to have this kind of proof at hand :) (although I personally don't need it (Evilgrin))
 
Moo said:
Well it'd be nice if you shared it with us, for some people may need to have this kind of proof at hand :) (although I personally don't need it (Evilgrin))

Try this :) It conditions on something similar that was so near to what I was trying to do, If you undestand what I am posting you can derive what I am asked to! Any more help I could provide that! Regards!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K