Solve Diff Eq: Change of Coordinates to Eliminate Squared Terms

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fantini
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Coordinates
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a differential equation of the form $$x' = a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + a_3 x^3 + \cdots$$ and the challenge of finding a $C^2$ change of coordinates to eliminate the squared term by substituting $$x = y + \alpha y^2$$. Participants explore methods to achieve this transformation and express uncertainty about the steps involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest substituting $$x = y + \alpha y^2$$ into the differential equation to analyze the resulting expressions.
  • It is noted that the derivative $$ (y + \alpha y^2)' = (2\alpha y + 1)y' $$ arises from the substitution.
  • Participants express uncertainty about how to proceed after substitution, particularly regarding finding a condition on $$\alpha$$ that allows for the elimination of the squared term.
  • One participant proposes using the binomial expansion to manipulate the equation but acknowledges that this method is heuristic and not rigorous.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of using the inverse function theorem or the implicit function theorem, with some participants unsure of how these theorems could be applied in this context.
  • Another participant asserts that $$x = y + \alpha y^2$$ is a $C^\infty$ change of coordinates, suggesting that if both series are convergent, they will be equivalent.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to eliminate the squared term or on the application of theorems related to the change of coordinates. Uncertainty remains regarding the rigor of the methods discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants express limitations in their understanding of how to rigorously apply certain mathematical theorems to the problem at hand. There is also a lack of clarity on the conditions required for the change of coordinates to be classified as $C^2$.

Fantini
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
267
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Consider the differential equation

$$x' = a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + a_3 x^3 + \cdots,$$

with $a_1 \neq 0$. Show that there exists a $C^2$ change of coordinates of the form $x = y + \alpha y^2$ that rewrites the equation (locally around $x=0$) as

$$y' = a_1 y + b_3 y^3 + \cdots,$$

that is, that eliminates the squared term.

I have no idea how to go about it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fantini said:
Here is the question:

Consider the differential equation

$$x' = a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + a_3 x^3 + \cdots,$$

with $a_1 \neq 0$. Show that there exists a $C^2$ change of coordinates of the form $x = y + \alpha y^2$ that rewrites the equation (locally around $x=0$) as

$$y' = a_1 y + b_3 y^3 + \cdots,$$

that is, that eliminates the squared term.

I have no idea how to go about it.

Substitute $x = y + \alpha y^2$ into the differential equation?
 
Fantini said:
Here is the question:

Consider the differential equation

$$x' = a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + a_3 x^3 + \cdots,$$

with $a_1 \neq 0$. Show that there exists a $C^2$ change of coordinates of the form $x = y + \alpha y^2$ that rewrites the equation (locally around $x=0$) as

$$y' = a_1 y + b_3 y^3 + \cdots,$$

that is, that eliminates the squared term.

I have no idea how to go about it.

I like Serena said:
Substitute $x = y + \alpha y^2$ into the differential equation?

First of all, for convenience, I will write $p(x) \equiv a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + a_3 x^3 + \cdots $

Now, if you try substituting in, you get
$$
(y + \alpha y^2)' = p(y + \alpha y^2)
$$
First of all, note that $(y + \alpha y^2)' = (2\alpha y + 1)y' $. As for the other side, we can note that
$$
p(y + \alpha y^2) =
a_1(y + \alpha y^2) +
a_2(y^2 + 2\alpha y^3 + \alpha ^2 y^4) + \cdots
$$

I'm not sure where to go from there either, but I think it might help to have it down. I suppose it might have something to do with finding a condition on $\alpha$ so that $(2\alpha y + 1)$ divides $p(y + \alpha y^2)$
 
TheBigBadBen said:
First of all, for convenience, I will write $p(x) \equiv a_1 x + a_2 x^2 + a_3 x^3 + \cdots $

Now, if you try substituting in, you get
$$
(y + \alpha y^2)' = p(y + \alpha y^2)
$$
First of all, note that $(y + \alpha y^2)' = (2\alpha y + 1)y' $. As for the other side, we can note that
$$
p(y + \alpha y^2) =
a_1(y + \alpha y^2) +
a_2(y^2 + 2\alpha y^3 + \alpha ^2 y^4) + \cdots
$$
Following TheBigBadBen's approach, $(2\alpha y + 1)y' = a_1(y + \alpha y^2) + a_2(y^2 + 2\alpha y^3 + \alpha ^2 y^4) + \ldots$. Now use the binomial expansion of $(1 + 2\alpha y)^{-1}$ (assuming that it converges) to get $$\begin{aligned}y' &= \bigl( a_1(y + \alpha y^2) + a_2(y^2 + 2\alpha y^3 + \alpha ^2 y^4) + \ldots\bigr)(1 + 2\alpha y)^{-1} \\ &= \bigl( a_1(y + \alpha y^2) + a_2(y^2 + 2\alpha y^3 + \alpha ^2 y^4) + \ldots\bigr)(1 - 2\alpha y + 4\alpha^2y^2 - \ldots) \\ &= a_1y + (a_2 - a_1\alpha)y^2 + \ldots.\end{aligned}$$ You can now put the coefficient of $y^2$ equal to $0$ to get an equation for $\alpha$. But that is a rather heuristic, non-rigorous method. I'm not sure how to deal with the requirement that this should be a $C^2$ change of coordinates.
 
This is what I thought as well, but he said we would use something like the inverse function theorem or the implicit function theorem. How would we apply any of these there?
 
Opalg said:
But that is a rather heuristic, non-rigorous method. I'm not sure how to deal with the requirement that this should be a $C^2$ change of coordinates.

I believe that $x=y+\alpha y^2$ is a $C^\infty$ change of coordinates.
Furthermore, if both series are convergent within some area around zero, they will be the same.

Fantini said:
This is what I thought as well, but he said we would use something like the inverse function theorem or the implicit function theorem. How would we apply any of these there?

I don't see how you might use either of those theorems in a useful manner.
 
I believe this settles the question. I don't think there's much more to be done than what we did so far. Thanks! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K