Solve Distance Problem: Boy Riding Bicycle for 30km

  • Thread starter Thread starter Equilibrium
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a boy riding a bicycle to a town 30 km away, where he encounters a rest period after riding 10 km, leading to a change in speed for the remaining distance. Participants are clarifying the setup and equations used to analyze the situation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of the equations related to the boy's journey, questioning the treatment of the initial 10 km and the implications of the rest period on the overall time and speed. Some participants explore the quadratic equation derived from the problem setup.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing different interpretations of the problem and engaging in mathematical reasoning. Some have offered alternative formulations and questioned the correctness of the original setup, while others are verifying their calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the original problem statement and the equations used, with participants noting potential misinterpretations and errors in setup. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify these aspects without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Equilibrium
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This problem has already been solved but i got a quite few clarifications:
http://www.algebra.com/algebra/homework/word/travel/Travel_Word_Problems.faq.question.493396.html

"a boy on his bicycle intends to arrive at a certain time to a town that is 30 km away from his home .after riding 10 km, he rested for half an hour and as a result he was obliged to ride the rest of the trip 2km/hr faster ."

Homework Equations


v = d/t
t = d/v

The Attempt at a Solution


Why did he disregard the 10km?
i think the formula should've of look like this:
\frac{30}{s}=\frac{10}{s}+0.5+\frac{20}{s+2}
(total time riding on original speed for the whole trip) = (time riding on original speed (for 10km))+(time rested)+(faster velocity on the rest (for 20km))

the formula he used:
\frac{30}{s}=\frac{30}{s+2}+0.5
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
He has to go 20km in the time remaining after traveling 10km at the slow speed, and waiting half an hour.

The time remaining is ##20/s = 0.5 + 20/(s+2)## ... agreeing with your formulation.

##40(s+2) = (s+2)s + 40s##

rearranging:
##s^2+2s-80=0##

by quadratic equation:
##s \in \{ 10,-8 \}##

possible answers are 10hr and -8hr ... pick the positive one.
This is the same answer.

So your question is, "how did he know that his version would be correct?"
Try plotting the velocity-time graph.
 
Last edited:
The solutions to the quadratic equation are +8 and -10.
The solution for the problem is then 8km/h.

In the link given he is solving a different problem. I suppose he did not read the problem carefully.
 
Did I set up the quadratic incorrectly ...

the discriminant is 324
so ##s =\frac{1}{2}(-2\pm\sqrt{324}=1\pm 9## ... Oh I see: I misplaced a minus sign!
<mumble mumble grzzl>
... time for bed!
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K