Solve Integral of dp^2 | Lower Boundary Ps, Upper P0

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hermano
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the integral of \( dp^2 \) within the context of a mass flow equation derived from Darcy's law. Participants explore the integration process, boundaries for the integral, and the mathematical validity of the expressions involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to solve the integral \( \int dp^2 \) given specific boundaries \( Ps \) and \( P0 \).
  • Another suggests substituting \( p^2 \) with a new variable \( q \) to facilitate integration, leading to \( \int dq \) instead.
  • A participant confirms that replacing \( p^2 \) with \( q \) simplifies the integration process, resulting in \( c p^2 \) after substituting back.
  • Concerns are raised about the original equation, with one participant questioning whether \( dp^2/dx \) is correctly represented, suggesting it may be a misinterpretation of derivatives.
  • Clarifications are provided regarding the relationship between \( dp^2 \) and \( d(p^2) \), emphasizing that \( d(p^2) \) can be integrated using variable substitution.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about determining the upper and lower boundaries for the integral in relation to input and output pressures in a flow context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the method of substitution for integration but express differing views on the correctness of the original equation and the interpretation of boundaries for the integral. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the proper boundaries for the integral.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the assumptions underlying the original equation and the definitions of the variables involved. The discussion also highlights potential confusion regarding the treatment of derivatives in the context of integration.

hermano
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
intgral of dp^2??

Hi,

I have the following equation:

[itex]\dot{m} = c \frac{dp^{2}}{dx}[/itex]

Integration gives:

[itex]\dot{m} \int dx = c \int dp^{2}[/itex]

How can I solve [itex]\int dp^{2}[/itex]??

The lower boundary is Ps and the upper boundary is P0 for the integral!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi hermano! :smile:

do you mean dq/dx where q = p2 ?

just integrate over q from q = (ps)2 to q = (p0)2 :wink:
 


Hi tiny-tim ;-)

I want to integrate dp^2! So you take some parameter q and say that this parameter q is equal to p^2 and then solve the integral of dq instead of dp^2. This gives q again and thus p^2! Then fill in the upper and lower boundary for p: P0^2 - Ps^2

Am I right?
 
if I'm correctly understanding your original equation, yes :smile:
 


My original question is how to solve this equation:

[itex]\dot{m} \int dx = c \int dp^{2}[/itex]

My problem is solving the right hand side of the equation namely:

[itex]c \int dp^{2}[/itex]

Your answer is: replace [itex]p^{2}[/itex] by q and solve this 'normal' integral [itex]c \int dq[/itex]! This gives c q, then replace q by [itex]p^{2}[/itex] again so the solution is c [itex]p^{2}[/itex]. Then I only have to fill in the boundaries for p. Right?
 
I think so, yes. :smile:
 


dp²/dx is an infinitesimal quantity. On the left side of equation, you have a finite quantity. Something is wrong.

You either have (dp/dx)² or d²p/dx². In either case, review your equation. Where do you get it from, anyways?
 


Hi K^2,

This equation comes from Darcy's law namely [itex]\dot{m} = \frac{p Q}{R T}[/itex]

Fill Q (volumetric flow rate form Darcy's law) in in the above equation gives:

[itex]\dot{m} = c p \frac{dp}{dx}[/itex]

With [itex]c[/itex] all the constants in the equation.

[itex]p \frac{dp}{dx}[/itex] is equal to [itex]\frac{1}{2} \frac{dp^2}{dx}[/itex]

And thus finally I got [itex]\dot{m} = \frac{c}{2} \frac{dp^2}{dx}[/itex]

Solving this:

[itex]\dot{m} \int dx = \frac{c}{2} \int dp^{2}[/itex]

Therefore my question: How to solve [itex]\int dp^{2}[/itex] ??
 
ah, now i see where it comes from! :rolleyes:

yes, the whole point of changing pdp/dx to 1/2 d(p2)/dx

(and btw, it's better to write it that way, with brackets)

is because that is a perfect derivative, and you can immediately integrate it to pf2 - pi2. :smile:

Incidentally, the same trick enables us to go from F = ma (in mechanics) via a = vdv/dx to ∆(1/2 mv2) :wink:
 
  • #10


Tiny-tim,

Do I make a fault against the mathematics by saying that [itex]\dot{m} = \frac{c}{2} \frac{dp^2}{dx}[/itex] can be solved through [itex]\dot{m} \int dx = \frac{c}{2} \int dp^{2}[/itex]??

Then still my question is: how to solve the right hand site of this equation namely the integral of [itex]\int dp^{2}[/itex] ??
 
  • #11


Yeah, you shouldn't write it as dp²/dx, because that means (dp)²/dx, and that just isn't right. d(p²)/dx, on the other hand, does make sense, and d(p²) can be integrated over using variable substitution.

[tex]\int f(u)du = \int f(x)\frac{du}{dx}dx[/tex]

Which in this case, turns integral over d(p²) into integral over 2p dp.
 
  • #12
hi hermano! :smile:

(btw, we say "a fault in the mathematics" … though you can say "a crime against mathematics"! :biggrin:)
hermano said:
Do I make a fault against the mathematics by saying that [itex]\dot{m} = \frac{c}{2} \frac{dp^2}{dx}[/itex] can be solved through [itex]\dot{m} \int dx = \frac{c}{2} \int dp^{2}[/itex]??

No, we often treat a derivative exactly like a fraction, and multiply both sides by dx (and then integrate) …

that's fine :smile:
Then still my question is: how to solve the right hand site of this equation namely the integral of [itex]\int dp^{2}[/itex] ??

∫ d(p2) = [p2] :wink:
 
  • #13


Thanks, now it is clear for me!

Maybe you both can help me with another small issue I'm facing with this equation! For the integral of my pressure, I have to fill in the upper and lower boundary for p^2! However, I doubt of the input pressure is my upper or lower boundary, and also the same for the output pressure. What tells me which pressure (input - output) is the upper and lower boundary for my integral?

The equation gives the mass flow through a pipe (Poiseuille) from the high input pressure to the lower ouput pressure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
966
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K