MHB Solve Linear Programming: Find Max Value & Calculate Bounds

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on solving a linear programming problem with a target function Z=0.045X+0.06Y-2, subject to several constraints. The maximum value was found graphically at X=200 and Y=300. Participants discuss the concept of Sensitivity Analysis, which helps determine the lower and upper bounds for variables and constraints, indicating how changes affect the optimal solution. The dual values, or Shadow Prices, reflect how much the target function increases when a constraint value changes. Understanding these concepts is crucial for interpreting the results of linear programming analyses.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I hope I am in the right forum, I have a question regarding linear programming (optimization).

I have this target function:

\[Z=0.045X+0.06Y-2\]

subject to the following constraints:
1.
\[X+Y\leqslant 500\]
2.
\[X\geqslant 0.2(X+Y)\]
3.
\[Y\geqslant 0.5(X+Y)\]
4.
\[X\leqslant 300\]
5.
\[Y\leqslant 300\]

\[X,Y\geq 0\]

And I have some questions related to this problem. The first one was to find the maximum value. I did this fairly easy graphically, by finding the region, looking at the "edges" and calculating values of 4 points.According to the graph the max value is at X=200 and Y=300.

Now for my question. In the solution attached to this problem, there were two tables, one for the variables X and Y and one for the constraints. In the table, there were values of LOWER BOUND and UPPER BOUND for each variable and each constraint. I do not understand where these values came from and how they were calculated.

For variable X and lower bound is 0 and the upper is 0.06. For variable Y the lower bound is 0.045 and the upper is infinity.

For constraint 1 the lower bound is 375 and the upper is 600. For constraint 2 the lower is minus infinity while the upper is 100. For constraint 3 the lower is -50 and the upper is infinity. For constraint 4 the lower is 200 and upper infinity. For constraint 5 the lower is 250 and the upper is 400.

For constraints 1 and 5 there was also something called "dual value", for con.1 it was 0.045 and for cons5. it was 0.015.

Can you please help me figure out how there values were calculated ?

thank you !
 

Attachments

  • lp.JPG
    lp.JPG
    13.5 KB · Views: 118
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Yankel,

Those numbers are the results of a so called Sensitivity Analysis or a What-if-analysis.
There is an option in Excel that will generate such a report.

The boundaries of the constraints indicate how far the constraint can be changed before the point of the optimal solution shifts to another intersection.

Similarly the boundaries of X and Y indicate how far the objective coefficients (0.045 resp. 0.06) can be changed before the point of the optimal solution shifts to another intersection.

Part of the analysis is also how much the target function increases when a constraint value is changed. This is your "dual value", which is also known as the Shadow Price.
 
Greetings, I am studying probability theory [non-measure theory] from a textbook. I stumbled to the topic stating that Cauchy Distribution has no moments. It was not proved, and I tried working it via direct calculation of the improper integral of E[X^n] for the case n=1. Anyhow, I wanted to generalize this without success. I stumbled upon this thread here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-to-prove-the-cauchy-distribution-has-no-moments.992416/ I really enjoyed the proof...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K