Solve ODE: Break into System of ODEs

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ode
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on breaking down the second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) given by $$L\ddot{\theta} + \dot{x}\dot{\theta} + \ddot{x}\theta = 0$$ into a system of first-order ODEs. The proposed method involves defining new variables: $x_{1}=x$, $x_{2}=\dot{x}$, $y_{1}=\theta$, and $y_{2}=\dot{\theta}$. The equation can be simplified to $\frac{d}{dt}(L\dot{\theta} + \dot{x}\theta) = 0$, allowing for integration to yield $L\dot{\theta} + \dot{x}\theta = \text{const}$. However, the discussion concludes that without additional information, it is not possible to fully resolve the system due to the presence of two dependent variables and only one equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with variable substitution techniques in differential equations
  • Knowledge of integration methods for ODEs
  • Basic concepts of dynamics, particularly acceleration and velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore methods for solving systems of first-order ODEs
  • Study variable substitution techniques in differential equations
  • Learn about the implications of constant acceleration in dynamic systems
  • Investigate the use of additional equations or constraints to solve underdetermined systems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers dealing with dynamic systems, particularly those working on the analysis and solution of ordinary differential equations.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Is there a way to break this up into a system of ODEs?
$$
L\ddot{\theta} + \dot{x}\dot{\theta} + \ddot{x}\theta = 0
$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a little unusual that you have a single second-order ODE in two independent variables, but you could just do this:
\begin{align*}
x_{1}&=x \\
x_{2}&= \dot{x} \\
y_{1}&= \theta \\
y_{2}&= \dot{ \theta} \\
0&=L \dot{y}_{2}+x_{2} y_{2}+ \dot{x}_{2} y_{1}.
\end{align*}

There is no $x$ in the original ODE, so you could theoretically integrate that once immediately by essentially leaving out the first equation.
 
dwsmith said:
Is there a way to break this up into a system of ODEs?
$$
L\ddot{\theta} + \dot{x}\dot{\theta} + \ddot{x}\theta = 0
$$
Notice that $\dot{x}\dot{\theta} + \ddot{x}\theta = \frac d{dt}(\dot{x}\theta)$, so (assuming that $L$ is a constant) the equation can be written $\frac d{dt}(L\dot{\theta} +\dot{x}\theta) = 0$. You can integrate this once, to get $L\dot{\theta} +\dot{x}\theta = $ const. But you still have the situation of two dependent variables and only one equation, so I don't see how you can go beyond there without further information.
 
Opalg said:
Notice that $\dot{x}\dot{\theta} + \ddot{x}\theta = \frac d{dt}(\dot{x}\theta)$, so (assuming that $L$ is a constant) the equation can be written $\frac d{dt}(L\dot{\theta} +\dot{x}\theta) = 0$. You can integrate this once, to get $L\dot{\theta} +\dot{x}\theta = $ const. But you still have the situation of two dependent variables and only one equation, so I don't see how you can go beyond there without further information.

I know that acceleration is positive and constant and velocity is positive. Does that offer enough information?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K