Solve Relativity Questions: Spacetime Coordinates in Reference Frames

  • Thread starter Thread starter fredrick08
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating spacetime coordinates for an event in different reference frames using Lorentz transformations. The initial attempt at solving the problem contained errors in applying the transformation equations, particularly in the interpretation of velocity and the correct formulation of the equations. Participants clarified that the velocity of the reference frame should not be considered zero, as it affects the calculations significantly. Corrections were suggested for both the x' and t' calculations, emphasizing the need to apply the correct Lorentz transformation equations. The conversation highlighted the importance of understanding the distinction between the event's motion and the reference frame's speed.
fredrick08
Messages
374
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An event has spacetime coordinates (x, t) = (1200 m, 2.0 μs) in reference frame S. What are
the event’s spacetime coordinates
(i) in reference frame S′ that moves in the positive x-direction at 0.8c and
(ii) in reference frame S′′ that moves in the negative x-direction at 0.8c?


Homework Equations


x'=\gammax-vt
t'=\gammat-vx/c^2
gamma=1/root(1-beta^2)
beta=v/c

The Attempt at a Solution


ok this is wat i did since v=0 i did.
x'=\gammax=(1200/(1-.8^2))=2000m
t'=\gammat=(2x10^-6/(1-.8^2)=3.33\mus

x"=x-\gammax=1200-x'=-800m
t"=t'=3.33\mus

im not sure about wat I've done just having doubts, could someone please confirm, or help me fix my mistake... thx
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone have any ideaS?
 
anyone?
 
please be patient.
most of it looks right, but I think you may have made a mistake when you were solving for x".

You also have your basic equations wrong. Check here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=110015
Your lucky that it didn't affect your answers though because v=0.

for example it should be
x'=(gamma) (x-vt)
NOT
x'=(gamma)x - vt
 
For part (i), v=+0.8c while for part (ii) v=-0.8c ...why did you have v=0 before?
 
ya i know i stuffed that part up... well becasue in my mind v=0 coz the event isn't moving?? and beta=0.8c?
 
coz if i change it to x'=gamma(x-vt)=(1200-((.8*3x10^8)*2x10^-6))/0.6=1200m?
if that's wat ur ur suggesting gabba.. beat=v/c=>v=beta*c=2.4x10^8m/s?
 
and t' would equal -2us?
 
na v has to equal 0... so x'=1200/0.6=2000m
t'=2x10^-6/.6=3.33us
im not 100% sure with x" and t"
but it makes sense to me if x"=x-x'=-800m
and because the direction doesn't effect the time then the time in both reference fromes should be equal.. thus t"=t'=3.33us??

can anymore ppl confirm this??
 
  • #10
fredrick08 said:
coz if i change it to x'=gamma(x-vt)=(1200-((.8*3x10^8)*2x10^-6))/0.6=1200m?

fredrick08 said:
and t' would equal -2us?
These parts look OK to me.

Take the same approach for S''. What's the only thing that changes in the Lorentz transformations?
 
  • #11
oh ok then ummm the only thing that changes is v??
 
  • #12
so x"=x-x'=1200-1200=0m
but does t" still equal t'=2us?
 
  • #13
can i ask doc al, y do u think that v= something when the event isn't moving?? coz its the complete opposite of what me and perillux think..
 
  • #14
fredrick08 said:
oh ok then ummm the only thing that changes is v??
Yes. If for S', v = +.8c, what will v equal in the formulas for S''?

fredrick08 said:
so x"=x-x'=1200-1200=0m
but does t" still equal t'=2us?
I have no idea where you got these values.
 
  • #15
fredrick08 said:
can i ask doc al, y do u think that v= something when the event isn't moving?? coz its the complete opposite of what me and perillux think..
Events don't move. v is the speed of the frame, not the event.

You need to read up on the Lorentz transformations and what they mean.
 
  • #16
sorry i kinda just thought wat would make sense to me... so for x" and t" instead of beta=1/root(1-.8^2) its -.8? but then doesn't that negative cancel with the square??

so x"=(1/root(1--.8^2))(1200-(0.8*3x10^8)(2x10^-6))=562m?? i dotn think that's rite..
 
  • #17
fredrick08 said:
sorry i kinda just thought wat would make sense to me... so for x" and t" instead of beta=1/root(1-.8^2) its -.8? but then doesn't that negative cancel with the square??
The value of gamma (not beta!) doesn't change, since the v is squared. But that's not the only place that v appears.
 
  • #18
ok i found another eqn in book under lorentz... I am sorry my book is really bad, and just formulas and not words... ct'=x'=gamma*t(c-v)=2x10^-6(3x10^8-(0.8*3x10^8))/0.6=200m? y am i getting different answers for the same things??
 
  • #19
ok yes so if x' and t' are correct then all x" and t" is...
x"=(1200-((-.8*3x10^8)*2x10^-6))/0.6=2800m
t"=(2x10^-6-((-.8*3x10^8)*1200)/(3x10^8)^2))/0.6)=8.66us?
 

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K