Solve Sets & De Morgan Homework - Introduction to Analysis 5th Ed. Gaughan

  • Thread starter Thread starter Krovski
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving De Morgan's Law as presented in "Introduction to Analysis 5th Edition" by Edward D. Gaughan. The specific statement to prove is that the intersection of sets \( S \) and \( A_{\lambda} \) is equal to the union of \( S \) and \( A \). The participant suggests that demonstrating the equivalence of two sets requires showing their mutual containment. They also propose starting with a simpler case involving three sets to build intuition for the general case.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory, including unions and intersections
  • Familiarity with De Morgan's Laws in set operations
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical proofs and logical reasoning
  • Proficiency in using notation for sets and elements
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of De Morgan's Laws for two and three sets
  • Explore the properties of unions and intersections in set theory
  • Learn about set containment and how to prove set equality
  • Review examples of proofs in "Introduction to Analysis 5th Edition" by Edward D. Gaughan
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying set theory and analysis, as well as educators looking for effective ways to teach De Morgan's Laws and set operations.

Krovski
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm using Introduction to Analysis 5th edition by Edward D. Gaughan.

The question is:
Prove (De Morgan)
S\(\bigcap A_{\lambda}) = \cup(S\A)
\lambda\epsilon \Lambda
Where \Lambda A and S are sets
(doesn't specify real or complex but assuming real)


Homework Equations


to prove two things equal it is enough to show they are contained within each other
union is all elements of both sets, none repeat (ie if two appears twice count it only once)
intersection is all elements common to both sets

The Attempt at a Solution



(for typing purposes I'll just write everything out in words rather than symbols, having trouble from my tablet)
I can understand that if there is some x that belongs to this set, it is clear that it belongs to S and not the intersection of A\lambda
On the right hand side of the equation I can see that if x is not in the intersection of A\lambda and it is in S, then the union of the two sets would mean that x is in the right hand side of the equation since it's in S.

I don't think it is enough for what my Prof. is looking for. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Krovski, perhaps we can start off a little smaller.

Let A,B, and C be sets.

For three sets, the DeMorgan's Law in question states:

A-(B ∩ C) = (A - B) ∪ (A - C).

*I am using A-B to denote {x| x is in A and x is not in B}

Prove that first. Then, perhaps solving this will give us a better intuition for arbitrary unions and intersections.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
17K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K