MHB Solve the $5000 Annuity Investment Today

  • Thread starter Thread starter Suraphel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Annuity
Suraphel
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Dear All,
Kindly help me by solving the following question, it gives me hard time to solve especially the word "commencing". Thank in advance.

How much would need to be invested today at 6% per annum to provide an annuity of $5000 per ten years commencing in 5 years.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"$5000 per 10 years"? Do you mean "$5000 per year for 10 years"?

"Commencing in five years" means that the initial principle draws interest for 5 years before any payout starts. If we call the principle "P" then after 5 years at 6% simple interest (you don't mention compounding) you will have P+ 5(0.06P)= P+ 0.30P= 1.3P.

The next year you will gain 0.6(1.3P) in interest but pay out $5000 so will have 0.06(1.3P)- 5000= [FONT=Verdana,Arial,Tahoma,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]0.078P- 5000.

The third year you will gain 0.6(0.078P- 5000) but pay out $5000 so will have 0.06(0.078P- 5000)- 5000= [FONT=Verdana,Arial,Tahoma,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]0.00468P- 5300.

Continue in that way through the 10 year, set that formula in P equal to 0, and solve for P.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top