Solve the Juggler Problem: Find Vo for Rod to Make Integer Number of Rotations

  • Thread starter Thread starter miew
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the Juggler Problem, specifically determining the initial vertical velocity (vo) required for a juggler to achieve an integer number of rotations with a uniform rod. Key equations include the linear motion equation V = V0 - gt and the rotational motion equation ω = ω0 + αt. The final derived formula for vo is v0 = gnπ/ω, where n represents the number of rotations and ω is the initial angular velocity. Participants emphasized the independence of linear and rotational motions and the importance of torque considerations in the analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear motion equations (e.g., V = V0 - gt)
  • Familiarity with rotational motion concepts (e.g., ω = ω0 + αt)
  • Knowledge of torque and its relation to angular motion
  • Basic calculus for solving motion equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular motion equations in physics
  • Learn about the relationship between torque and angular momentum
  • Explore the concept of center of mass in rigid body dynamics
  • Investigate advanced projectile motion problems involving rotation
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in mechanics, particularly those studying rotational dynamics and projectile motion.

miew
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
b]1. Homework Statement [/b]

A juggler is juggling a uniform rod one end of which is coated in tar and burning. He is holding the rod by the opposite end and throws it up so that, at the moment of release, it is horizontal, its Center of Mass is traveling vertically up at speed vo and it is rotating with angular velocity wo. To catch it, he wants to arrange that when it returns to his hand it will have made an integer number of complete rotations. What should vo be, if the rod is the have made exactly n rotations when it returns to his hand?

Homework Equations



L=rxp
torque=dL/dt

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't even know how to start...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi miew! :smile:

(have an omega: ω and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
miew said:
I don't even know how to start...

ok, the linear motion and the rotational motion are completely independent, so start by writing out the two equations for them (one each), as a function of t …

what are they? :smile:
 
think this,
lest rod goes up by some distance l(doesn't matter what's l)
you can calc. what time will it take to come to same horizontal level
in that time the rod should make n rotations
find time for 1 rotation using wo
now time of flight = time for n complete rotations
 
So, for the linear motion:
V=V0-gt

And for the rotational motion:

\omega= \omega 0+\alphat

Cupid.callin what do you mean by lest rod goes up by some distance l?
 
miew said:
Cupid.callin what do you mean by lest rod goes up by some distance l?

i meant Let
 
hi miew! :smile:

(what happened to that ω i gave you? :confused:)
miew said:
So, for the linear motion:
V=V0-gt

And for the rotational motion:

ω = ω0 + αt

Yes, that's correct, but you really need equations for s and θ, not ω and α :smile:
 
(didn't I use omega :/ ? )

So the time to make one rotation is t= 2 \pi / \omega0 right ?

And in that time it goes up a distance x= Vot - \frac{1}{2}gt where t is the one above ?

Am I in the right track ? :)
 
hi miew! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
miew said:
So the time to make one rotation is t= 2 \pi / \omega0 right ?

And in that time it goes up a distance x= Vot - \frac{1}{2}gt where t is the one above ?

(easier to type and to read if you use ω and π instead of the LaTeX versions :wink:)

yup! :biggrin: (gt2, of course) …

except the question says he's a really good juggler, and you have to use nt instead of t :wink:

ok, now find an equation relating v0 and ω0, and then solve for v0 ! :smile:
 
(I can't find your omegas and pi...:( )

Okay, so this is what I got.

t=2npi/\omega

Vf=v0-gt and since Vf=0, v0=gt
but it goes up and down, so the total time is

t=2vo/g.

And then, v0=gnpi/\omega

Is that right ? :)
 
  • #10
hi miew! :smile:

(you could have copied-and-pasted the ω and π i used :wink: … see a fuller list below)

yes that's fine …

but you could have done it slightly quicker by saying that when it returns, v will be minus v0, so v0 - (-v0) = gt :wink:

(alternatively, 0 = v0t - gt2/2 give the same result without having to know that v = -v0)
 
  • #11
Oh you are right !:smile:

THank you so much for your help, you were really helpful :smile:
 
  • #12
Hi, bringing up this old thread because I was stuck on the same problem for a little bit, though for a different reason. I understand the derivation as it is, but the thing that held me back was accounting for the torque due to gravity. Is the torque on each infinitesimal rod element canceled by the torque on element opposite the center of mass?
 
  • #13
hi diligence! :smile:
diligence said:
… the torque due to gravity. Is the torque on each infinitesimal rod element canceled by the torque on element opposite the center of mass?

yes (even for an irregular shape) …

∫ ρ (r - rc.o.m) x g dxdydz

= {∫ ρ (r - rc.o.m) dxdydz} x g

= 0 x g :wink:
 
  • #14
Thanks Tim. So I guess it's basically inherent in the definition of center of mass? Yes, that's now obvious in hindsight. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K