A Solve the Partial differential equation ##U_{xy}=0##

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,827
Reaction score
415
TL;DR
I am going through these notes; i want to check that i am gettting it right...

Solve the pde;

##U_{xy}=0##
This is part of the notes;

1670243380258.png


My own way of thought;

Given;

##U_{xy}=0##

then considering ##U_x## as on ode in the ##y## variable; we integrate both sides with respect to ##y## i.e

##\dfrac{du}{dx} \int \dfrac{1}{dy} dy=\int 0 dy##

this is the part i need insight...the original problem involves partial derivatives but in this case when we integrate with respect to ##y## we are integrating with respect to ##dy## and not ##∂y## ...correct?

##U_x= 0 + k##, where ##k## is a constant in terms of ##x## therefore,

##U_x= f(x)##, an arbitrary function of ##x##... which is an ode for ##u## in the ##x## variable. On integrating again with respect to ##x## we get,##U(x,y) = F(x) + k##, where ##k## is a constant in terms of ##y## therefore,

##U(x,y) = F(x) + H(y)##cheers!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I interpret you as follows.
\frac{\partial^2 U(x,y)}{\partial x \partial y}=0
Integration by y with x=const. or by x with y=const.
\frac{\partial U}{\partial x }=f(x)
\frac{\partial U}{\partial y }=g(y)
Thus
dU=f(x)dx+g(y)dy
U(x,y)=F(x)+G(y)
 
Last edited:
anuttarasammyak said:
I interpret you as follows.
\frac{\partial^2 U(x,y)}{\partial x \partial y}=0
Integration by y with x=const. or by x with y=const.
\frac{\partial U}{\partial x }=f(x)
\frac{\partial U}{\partial y }=g(y)
Thus
dU=f(x)dx+g(y)dy
U(x,y)=F(x)+G(y)
Is there another way bro? ...they call it method of characteristic ...need to read on this...
 
chwala said:
Given;
##U_{xy}=0##

then considering ##U_x## as on ode in the ##y## variable; we integrate both sides with respect to ##y## i.e

##\dfrac{du}{dx} \int \dfrac{1}{dy} dy=\int 0 dy##
The above doesn't make any sense to me. Clearly the last integral would be 0 + a constant.
chwala said:
this is the part i need insight...the original problem involves partial derivatives but in this case when we integrate with respect to ##y## we are integrating with respect to ##dy## and not ##∂y## ...correct?
The expression ##dy## serves only to indicate the variable with respect to which integration is taking place. You are integrating with respect to y, not dy, and definitely not with respect to ∂y.
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
867
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K