Solve Thin-Film Equations: Red Light on Oil in Water

  • Thread starter Thread starter r_swayze
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the refractive index of oil in water using the thin-film interference equation. The relevant equation is 2nt = (m + 1/2) λ, where λ is the wavelength of red light (615 nm) and the oil film thickness is 2.640e-7 m. The correct refractive index is determined to be approximately 1.33, indicating that the refractive index of oil must be less than that of water. The user initially miscalculated the refractive index as 0.58239, which is incorrect due to misunderstanding the value of m in the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thin-film interference principles
  • Familiarity with Snell's Law
  • Knowledge of refractive index concepts
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study thin-film interference in detail, focusing on constructive and destructive interference
  • Learn about Snell's Law and its applications in optics
  • Explore the concept of refractive index and its significance in different media
  • Practice solving problems involving optical thickness and wavelength calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, particularly those studying optics, as well as educators looking for practical examples of thin-film interference and refractive index calculations.

r_swayze
Messages
65
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



White light illuminates an oil film on water. Viewing it directly from above, it looks red. Assume that the reflected red light has a wavelength of 615 nm in air, and that the oil has a thickness of 2.640e-7 m. What is the refractive index of the oil? Assume that the refractive index of water is greater than that of the oil.

Homework Equations



2nt = (m+1/2) λ

The Attempt at a Solution



2nt = (m+1/2) λ

n = 1/2 λ/(2t) = 1/2 (615e-9)/(2*2.64e-7)

n = 0.58239

I don't know why this answer is wrong. The problem seems to be straight forward, just plug in the numbers into formula right?

If m is greater than 0 then the answer n comes out higher then the refraction index of water, 1.33, so m has to be 0 I presume?

Edit: Never mind, figured it out.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
how you figured this out? can i know?
 
A refractive index less than 1 implies that the speed of light in that medium would be faster than the speed of light in vacuum!

To solve this example, you just need to consider the constructive interference condition, and couple that with Snell's Law.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K