Solving a Buoyancy Problem: Cube of Ice in Water & Ethyl Alcohol

  • Thread starter Thread starter eri139
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buoyancy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the distance from the top of the water to the bottom face of a floating ice cube when ethyl alcohol is poured on top. The ice cube has an edge length of 17.0 mm, and the alcohol layer is 5.00 mm thick. The correct approach involves using the hydrostatic equilibrium equation, incorporating the densities of ice (934 kg/m³), water (1000 kg/m³), and ethyl alcohol (789 kg/m³). The final calculated distance from the water surface to the bottom of the ice cube is 10.31 mm when using the accurate density of ice at 917 kg/m³.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hydrostatic equilibrium principles
  • Familiarity with density calculations
  • Knowledge of the relationship between buoyancy and volume displacement
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of buoyancy and Archimedes' principle
  • Learn about density variations in different substances, particularly ice and alcohol
  • Explore hydrostatic pressure calculations in fluid mechanics
  • Practice solving problems involving multiple fluid layers and their interactions
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, educators teaching fluid mechanics, and anyone interested in buoyancy-related problems.

eri139
Messages
15
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A cube of ice whose edge is 17.0 mm is floating in a glass of ice-cold water with one of its faces parallel to the water surface.

Ice-cold ethyl alcohol is gently poured onto the water surface to form a layer 5.00 mm thick above the water. When the ice cube attains hydrostatic equilibrium again, what will be the distance from the top of the water to the bottom face of the block?

Homework Equations


FB=ρVg
W = mg
V = lwh

The Attempt at a Solution


Here is my work. I have checked and rechecked it, but for some reason it's still not correct! Please help!

mg = FBalcohol + FBwater
m = ρalcoholValcohol + ρwaterVwater
ρiceV = ρalcoholValcohol + ρwaterVwater
934 x 173 = 789 x 172 x 5 mm + 1000 x 172 x h
934 x 17 = 789 x 5 + 1000h
h = 11.933 mm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The ## h ## in your 3rd to the last equation needs to be ## L=17-5-h ## to compute the volume of water that is displaced. You basically computed ## L=11.933 ##... which is how much of the cube is immersed in the water portion. ## \\ ## Edit: I read it too quickly: I was computing the ## h ## from the surface of the liquid to the top of the block. Anyway, ## L=11.93 ## mm is immersed in water, and add ## 5 ## mm to that to get their ##h ##. ## \\ ## Edit: Nope, I read it too quickly a second time: It says the surface of the water, and not the surface of the liquid. I think you may have it right, but the person who wrote out the problem didn't read his own words carefully enough. ## \\ ## Another idea: The problem could also be the sig figs in your answer. Try putting in 11.9.
 
Last edited:
Where did you get your ρice value? What I've seen in the literature for ice at 0°C is more like ##0.9150 gm/cm^3##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
gneill said:
Where did you get your ρice value? What I've seen in the literature for ice at 0°C is more like ##0.9150 gm/cm^3##.
Google. I typed in "ice density" and the first value that popped up was that one. Unfortunately, I've just figured it out that this density is wrong and is the reason why my answers have been thrown off. Now I've finally gotten it...glad to see it wasn't an issue with my understanding, though!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gneill and Charles Link
eri139 said:
Google. I typed in "ice density" and the first value that popped up was that one. Unfortunately, I've just figured it out that this density is wrong and is the reason why my answers have been thrown off. Now I've finally gotten it...glad to see it wasn't an issue with my understanding, though!
Yeah, Never believe the first entry to pop up from Google. Always check the source to see if it's reputable. Too many non-academic searchers bubble disreputable sources to the top of the hit list. It's a sad thing, but its just the way it is. Glad you worked out your issue!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: eri139 and Charles Link
@eri139, Not a trivial problem. I see nothing wrong with the wording. What was your answer? I used symbols instead of numbers & won't do the arithmetic, as usual. :frown: The answer turned out to be pretty elaborate, involving all three densities plus the alcohol layer depth plus the cube's side.

(I also did a second computation to verify my answer.)

EDIT: the anser can be simplified to comprise just the three densities and one side of the cube. With the simplification the answer I got is 11.68mm using ice density at 934 kg/m^3. But post 3 is right: should be 917 kg/m^3 in which case the answer I get is 10.31mm.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K