MHB Solving a Recurrence: $a_0 = 2$

  • Thread starter Thread starter magneto1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Recurrence
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the recurrence relation defined by $a_0 = 2$ and $a_{n+1} = 2a_n + \sqrt{3(a_n)^2 - 12}$. Participants explore various transformations of the equation to derive a closed-form solution, noting that the sequence is increasing and does not converge to a limit. A key insight involves rewriting the recurrence to isolate terms, leading to an approximation of $a_n$ that incorporates a geometric series. The approximation suggests that $a_n$ can be expressed in terms of $(2 + \sqrt{3})^n$, with an error term that diminishes as $n$ increases. The discussion concludes with a promising approach to bounding the error term and refining the closed-form expression.
magneto1
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
Not sure if Discrete Math is the correct category, but I'm looking for some idea / hint on how to tackle the following recurrence.

$a_0 = 2$, and $a_{n+1} = 2a_{n} + \sqrt{3(a_n)^2 - 12}$ for $n \in \Bbb{N}$.

Some attempts to massage the equation got me: $(a_{n+1}-a_n)^2 = 2a_na_{n+1} - 12$, which is equally messy.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
magneto said:
Not sure if Discrete Math is the correct category, but I'm looking for some idea / hint on how to tackle the following recurrence.

$a_0 = 2$, and $a_{n+1} = 2a_{n} + \sqrt{3(a_n)^2 - 12}$ for $n \in \Bbb{N}$.

Some attempts to massage the equation got me: $(a_{n+1}-a_n)^2 = 2a_na_{n+1} - 12$, which is equally messy.
What do you want to do? If it is to find the limit for an, then a nice 'trick' is to just drop all the subscripts. That is, if an goes to a as n goes to infinity, so does an-1, an-2, an-3, ..., an-k for any fixed k. Of course, that only works if there is a 'nice' limit. However this an goes to infinity which is not nice.

EDIT: Read more here
A003500 - OEIS
 
Last edited:
The original question was to show all members of the sequence are integers. However, I am interested in a "closed form" formula for this recurrence. (Since the sequence is increasing, its limit does not exist.)
 
magneto said:
The original question was to show all members of the sequence are integers. However, I am interested in a "closed form" formula for this recurrence. (Since the sequence is increasing, its limit does not exist.)
See EDIT above
 
Some thoughts: if you rewrite the equation as:
$$a_n = 2a_{n - 1} + \sqrt{3a_{n - 1}^2} - \delta(a_{n - 1})$$
Where $\delta$ is defined for $z \geq 2$ as:
$$\delta(z) = \sqrt{3z^2} - \sqrt{3z^2 - 12}$$
Then we have:
$$a_n = 2a_{n - 1} + \sqrt{3} a_{n - 1} - \delta(a_{n - 1}) = (2 + \sqrt{3}) a_{n - 1} - \delta(a_{n - 1})$$
Expanding out we find:
$$a_n = (2 + \sqrt{3}) \left ( (2 + \sqrt{3}) a_{n - 2} - \delta(a_{n - 2}) \right ) - \delta(a_{n - 1})$$
$$a_n = (2 + \sqrt{3})^2 a_{n - 2} - (2 + \sqrt{3})\delta(a_{n - 2}) - \delta(a_{n - 1})$$
Iterating we (eventually) get:
$$a_n = 2 \cdot (2 + \sqrt{3})^n - \sum_{k = 1}^n (2 + \sqrt{3})^{k - 1} \delta(a_{n - k})$$
So now the problem is to bound the error term in the sum. We see that $\delta(z)$ tends to $2 \sqrt{3} / z$ quite quickly, which combined with the asymptotic growth of the sequence of $a_m \approx (2 + \sqrt{3})^m$ yields the good approximation:
$$\delta(a_m) \approx \frac{2 \sqrt{3}}{(2 + \sqrt{3})^m}$$
Allowing us to approximate our expression as:
$$a_n \approx 2 \cdot (2 + \sqrt{3})^n - \sum_{k = 1}^n (2 + \sqrt{3})^{k - 1} \frac{2 \sqrt{3}}{(2 + \sqrt{3})^{n - k}} = 2 \cdot (2 + \sqrt{3})^n - \frac{2 \sqrt{3}}{(2 + \sqrt{3})^{n + 1}} \sum_{k = 1}^n (2 + \sqrt{3})^{2k}$$
Which is a geometric series, and we get:
$$a_n \approx 2 \cdot (2 + \sqrt{3})^n - \frac{(2 + \sqrt{3})^{2n} - 1}{(2 + \sqrt{3})^{n + 1}} \left [ \frac{12 + 7 \sqrt{3}}{3 + 2 \sqrt{3}} \right ]$$
Which seems to be a good, if not exact approximation, and probably actually reduces to the closed form in John Harris' OEIS link.​
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K