MHB Solving a Third-Degree Polynomial with Real Coefficients

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $f(x)$ be a third-degree polynomial with real coefficients satisfying $|f(1)|=|f(2)|=|f(3)|=|f(5)|=|f(6)|=|f(7)|=12$.

Find $|f(0)|$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Because a cubic polynomial shall have maximum 2 humps ( that is where it goes from down to up and from
up to down ) we shall have $f(1) = f(5)= f(6)$ and $f(2) = f(3) = f(7)$ and $f(1) \ne f(2)$.

For them to have values not meeting this criteria we shall have more humps .

As we are interested in absolute value we can choose $f(1) = - f(2) = 12$

As $f(1) = f(5)= f(6) = 12$ So we have $f(1) - 12 = f(5) - 12 = f(6) - 12 = 0$

So we can choose $f(x) = A(x-1)(x-5)(x-6) + 12 $ where A is a constant whose value we need to find

Putting $x=2$ we get $f(2) = A* 1 * (-3) *(-4) + 12 = 12A + 12 = - 12$ or A = -2

So $f(x) = -2(x-1)(x-5)(x-6) + 12$

Or $f(0) = -2 * (-1)(-5)(-6) + 12 = 72$

Or $\left | f(0) \right |= 72 $
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top