Solving an IVP with Green's Theorem: Wondering?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the initial and boundary value problem defined by the wave equation $$u_{tt}(x,t)-c^2u_{xx}(x,t)=0$$ for $x>0$ and $t>0$, with boundary conditions $u(0,t)=0$, $u(x,0)=f(x)$, and $u_t(x,0)=g(x)$. The participants explore the necessity of expanding the problem to $x \in \mathbb{R}$ to apply Green's theorem effectively. The solution involves using odd extensions of the initial conditions, leading to the formulation of the solution $u(x,t)$ in terms of $f_{\text{odd}}$ and $g_{\text{odd}}$. The odd extension is crucial for ensuring the boundary condition at $x=0$ is satisfied.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave equations and their properties
  • Familiarity with Green's theorem and its applications
  • Knowledge of odd and even function extensions
  • Proficiency in solving partial differential equations (PDEs)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Green's theorem in solving PDEs
  • Learn about odd and even extensions of functions in mathematical analysis
  • Explore separation of variables as a method for solving wave equations
  • Investigate the implications of boundary conditions on solutions to PDEs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students focusing on wave phenomena, particularly those interested in advanced techniques for solving partial differential equations and applying Green's theorem in practical scenarios.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

If we have the initial and boundary value problem $$u_{tt}(x,t)-c^2u_{xx}(x,t)=0, x>0, t>0 \\ u(0,t)=0 \\ u(x,0)=f(x), x\geq 0 \\ u_t(x,0)=g(x)$$ and we want to apply Green's theorem do we have to expand the problem to $x \in \mathbb{R}$ ?? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

If we have the initial and boundary value problem $$u_{tt}(x,t)-c^2u_{xx}(x,t)=0, x>0, t>0 \\ u(0,t)=0 \\ u(x,0)=f(x), x\geq 0 \\ u_t(x,0)=g(x)$$ and we want to apply Green's theorem do we have to expand the problem to $x \in \mathbb{R}$ ?? (Wondering)

Couldn't you just separate the variables?
 
Yes, but I want to use this method.

- - - Updated - - -

In my notes they do it as followed:

$$w_{tt}-c^2w_{xx}=0, x \in \mathbb{R}, t>0 \\ w(x,0)=f_{\text{odd}}(x), x \in \mathbb{R} \\ w_t(x,0)=g_{\text{odd}} (x), x \in \mathbb{R}$$

$$w(x,t)=\frac{1}{2}(f_{\text{odd}}(x-ct)+f_{\text{odd}}(x+ct))+\frac{1}{2c}\int_{x-ct}^{x+ct}g_{\text{odd}}(s)ds \\ w(0,t)=\frac{1}{2}(f_{\text{odd}}(-ct)+f_{\text{odd}}(ct))+\frac{1}{2c}\int_{-ct}^{ct}g_{\text{odd}}(s)ds=0$$

So, for $x>0, t>0$

$$u(x,t)=w(x,t)=\frac{1}{2}(f_{\text{odd}}(x-ct)+f_{\text{odd}}(x+ct))+\frac{1}{2c}\int_{x-ct}^{x+ct}g_{\text{odd}}(s)ds$$

$$u(x,t)=\left\{\begin{matrix}
\frac{1}{2}{(f(x-ct)+f(x+ct))+\frac{1}{2c}{\int_{x-ct}^{x+ct}g(s)ds, \ \ x-ct \geq 0}}\\ \\
\frac{1}{2}(-f(ct-x)+f(x+ct))+\frac{1}{2c}\int_{ct-x}^{x+ct}g(s)ds \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\end{matrix}\right.$$

Why have we taken the odd extension although we solve $u$ and not $w$ ?? (Wondering)
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K