Solving associated Legendre equation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ShayanJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Legendre
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the associated Legendre differential equation represented as y'' + (2x/(x^2-1))y' + [λ + (m^2/(x^2-1))]y = 0 using series expansion around the regular singularity x_0 = 1. The participant outlines the procedure involving Laurent series expansion for p(x) and q(x), leading to a quadratic equation for r. They identify coefficients A_{-1} = 1 and B_{-2} = 0, resulting in solutions y_1 and y_2. The participant later realizes the initial differential equation was incorrectly stated and acknowledges the error in having x in the recursion relation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, specifically second-order linear equations.
  • Familiarity with series expansion techniques, including Laurent series.
  • Knowledge of associated Legendre functions and their properties.
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation and manipulation of series terms.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of associated Legendre functions in detail.
  • Learn about the method of Frobenius for solving differential equations near singular points.
  • Explore the implications of recursion relations in series solutions of differential equations.
  • Investigate common mistakes in series expansions and how to avoid them in differential equations.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students focused on advanced differential equations, particularly those studying special functions and their applications in theoretical physics.

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,802
Reaction score
605
I'm trying to solve the associated Legendre differential equation:

<br /> y&#039;&#039;+\frac{2x}{x^2-1}y&#039;+[ \lambda+\frac{m^2}{x^2-1}]y=0<br />

By series expansion around one of its regular singularities.(e.g. x_0=1)

This equation is of the form:

<br /> y&#039;&#039;+p(x)y&#039;+q(x)y=0<br />

Which is solved by the following procedure:
1-Expand p(x) and q(x) in laurent series:

<br /> p(x)=\sum_{-1}^{\infty} A_n (x-x_0)^n \\ \\<br /> q(x)=\sum_{-2}^{\infty} B_n(x-x_0)^n<br />

2-Solve the equation r^2+(A_{-1}-1)r+B_{-2}=0 for r
3-Based on the value(s) of r, write y as a series and find the coefficients by substitution in the differential equation.

For the associated Legendre eqaution,I find A_{-1}=1 and B_{-2}=0
which means r=0.So the solutions have the forms:

<br /> y_1=1+\sum_1^{\infty}a_n(x-1)^n \\<br /> y_2=y_1 \ln{|x-1|}+\sum_0^{\infty}b_n(x-1)^n<br />

When I substitute y_1 in the equation,I get the following:

<br /> \sum_1^{\infty} [ n(n+1)a_n + \large{\frac{2xna_n}{x+1} +\frac{m^2 a_{n-1}}{x+1} }](x-1)^n+[\lambda(x-1)+\frac{m^2}{x+1}](x-1)=0<br />

Now I have two questions:
1-Its obvious that the relation between a_n and a_{n-1} involves x.Is it acceptable?why?
2-How am I supposed to use the equation,which is gained by equating the terms outside the sum to zero?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well,I guess I should change my question a bit.
First,the differential equation I wrote in the last post isn't the associated legendre equation.
Second,I now understand its completely wrong to have x in the recursion relation.
So I should ask,what's wrong with my way of solving that equation?
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
535
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K