Solving Diff. Eqns with Constants: a & b

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KrayzBlu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the form of solutions to a pair of coupled differential equations involving second partial derivatives of two functions, f(x,y) and g(x,y), with constants a and b. The participants explore various methods and approaches to solve these equations, including the use of separation of variables and transformations, while expressing uncertainty about the specific forms of the solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks the form of solutions for the equations and mentions attempts with exponentials and Bessel functions without success.
  • Another participant suggests deriving a fourth-order equation from the original pair and proposes using separation of variables to solve it.
  • A different participant reiterates the original equations and derives a relationship involving the fourth derivative of f, indicating a potential path forward.
  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the relationship between the left and right sides of an equation presented by another, indicating a lack of clarity on the solution process.
  • Another participant reflects on their initial dismissal of exponentials and proposes a transformation involving integrals of the functions, questioning the feasibility of determining the form of one function without boundary conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the form of the solutions or the methods to solve the equations. Multiple approaches and models are discussed, but uncertainty remains regarding the effectiveness of these methods without specific boundary conditions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the absence of boundary conditions, which may significantly affect the solution space and the assumptions made in the proposed methods. There is also a reliance on the definitions of the functions f and g, which are not fully specified.

KrayzBlu
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I've been looking for the form of the solution(s) to following differential equations:

[itex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x \partial y}f(x,y) = a \cdot g(x,y)[/itex]
[itex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x \partial y}g(x,y) = b \cdot f(x,y)[/itex]

Where a and b are unrelated constants, and f,g are of the same general form. I've tried exponentials and different categories of Bessel functions, with no luck. Does anyone recognize what form the solution(s) might take? Or have an idea of how I could proceed to solve this?

Thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are your boundary conditions?

If you have a rectangular domain take [itex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x \partial y}[/itex] of your first equation and then use [itex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x \partial y}g =b f[/itex] to get a single forth order equation [itex]\frac{\partial^4}{\partial x^2 \partial y^2}f =ab f[/itex].

You can use separation of variables and let [itex]f\left(x,y\right) =X\left(x\right) Y\left(y\right)[/itex].

This will give you two second order equations, one for [itex]X\left(x\right)[/itex] and one for [itex]Y\left(y\right)[/itex]. Both of which are solvable.
 
KrayzBlu said:
Hello,

I've been looking for the form of the solution(s) to following differential equations:

[itex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x \partial y}f(x,y) = a \cdot g(x,y)[/itex]
[itex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x \partial y}g(x,y) = b \cdot f(x,y)[/itex]

Where a and b are unrelated constants, and f,g are of the same general form. I've tried exponentials and different categories of Bessel functions, with no luck. Does anyone recognize what form the solution(s) might take? Or have an idea of how I could proceed to solve this?

Thanks in advance :)

Differentiating the first with respect to x and y and eliminating [itex]\frac{\partial^2 g}{\partial x\,\partial y}[/itex] using the second gives
[tex]\frac{\partial^4 f}{\partial x^2 \,\partial y^2} = ab f[/tex]

Setting [itex]f(x,y) = X(x)Y(y)[/itex] then gives
[tex] X'' Y'' = ab XY[/tex]
so that
[tex] \frac{X''}{X} \frac{Y''}{Y} = ab[/tex]
Thus if [itex]X'' = CX[/itex] then [itex]Y'' = (ab/C)Y[/itex]. The corresponding eigenfunction for [itex]g[/itex] is then obtained from the first equation as
[tex] \frac1a \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x\,\partial y} = \frac 1a X'(x)Y'(y)[/tex]
 
Thanks for your replies.

the_wolfman, thanks for your suggestion, I wish I had some specific boundary conditions - I'll think about that and let you know, but I would be happy with anyone of the equation form(s) that would solve this.

pasmith, thank you as well. I'm not sure how in your final equation, the left hand side is any different from the right hand side, and how that solution helps.

Unfortunately, I'm still at a loss as to what functions would satisfy these equations, since exponentials or their relatives don't seem to work.
 
Some progress

My engineering brain wasn't used to this sort of math, so I may have been to quick to say that exponentials don't work - my apologies

I suppose that if [itex]f(x,y) = e^{h(x,y)}[/itex], and [itex]g(x,y) = e^{i(x,y)}[/itex], then we can say that [itex]h(x,y) = a\int{\frac{g(x,y)}{f(x,y)}}[/itex] and [itex]i(x,y) = b\int{\frac{f(x,y)}{g(x,y)}}[/itex]. From this, we can infer that [itex]g(x,y) = e^{ab\int{\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x \partial y}\frac{1}{h(x,y)}}}[/itex], such that all we need is a form for h(x,y).

Is it impossible to guess at the form of h(x,y) without any boundary conditions?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K